Apache Camel vs webMethods Trading Network

• Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel.
• There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported.
• Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix.
• There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms.
• Camel is also good for creating microservices.

Read full review

• Document tracking
• Efficient partner management
• Set up trading partners with connectivity information

Read full review

• I find the "seda" endpoint to be less obvious that it is doing multi-threading than Spring Integration's executor mechanism.
• Integration with Spring Beans is pretty good, but I believe SI's is a bit better (for obvious reasons, both being Spring products).
• SI's use support is probably a bit better/faster and I believe the user base is larger so that there are most questions/answers for SI on StackOverflow

Read full review

• Certificate management
• More document types support is needed
• More DB types support

Read full review

• Apache Camel is open source and Java based. So if your engineering team is strong in Java this could be a good framework to adopt.
• Apache camel is open source.
• Camel could be run on OSGi containers like Karaf or Fuse.

Read full review

• Increased order processing
• Resubmission of data
• Increased revenue
• Automated data exchange

Read full review