Attivo BOTsink vs. FortiDeceptor

It is best suited when deployed at perimeter and integrated with SIEM and SOAR solution. It will be able to replicate assets and display realistic configurations making difficult for hackers. We were able to avoid or block 40% of attacks targetted to our critical servers and could easily identify threat actors.

Incentivized

To help the Infosec Team Scale & create a seamless consolidated threat response. FortiDeceptor all the Security analysts to manually investigate & manual remediation or automatically block these attacks based on severity before actual damage occurs via integration with Fortigate to quarantine the IP address of the threat actor, FortiNAC to isolate devices within an organization with FortiSOAR to trigger appropriate playbooks for an orchestrated response and with 3rd party solutions to trigger a response action via built-in fabric connector API. FortiDeceptor needs other FortiFabric Devices to respond well, however, FortiDeceptor also connects with other solutions via built-in fabric connector API, but you may miss the real-time data flow or may be delayed in response.

Incentivized

• Identifies devices
• Provides threat details in real time
• Provides network topology with potential threat paths

Incentivized

• Protects against all types of malware.
• Provides visibility to potential attacks to your network.
• Blocks access to inappropriate websites.

Incentivized

• More fine tuning of threat detection capabilities needed
• Users should be able to modify AIML configuration
• Improving the display dashboard

Incentivized

• FortiSandbox integration has limited/basic Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) capabilities.

Incentivized

Attivo BoTsink was selected based on cost price and wide coverage of detection capabilities. Our decision was primarily based on reducing efforts to identify and mitigation of attacks. The ease of deployment was additional factor in decision making. As compared to Zscaler Deception and SentinelOne Singularity I found Attivo BoTsink detects more threats

Incentivized

Since we have other Fortinet solutions like Fortigate NGFW & FortiSIEM in place, they share the threat intelligence with each other, and FortiDeceptor works very well in FortiFabric environments, We decided to go with FortiDeceptor for Deception technology. In the case of Rapid7 & Smokescreen, we had to counter the integration issue with existing IT infra, Security solutions should not work in silos, they need to share intelligence with each other to get the best from the existing Solution & to get the best ROI.

Incentivized

• Advanced reporting has saved from hiring additional personnel to monitor security threats
• Real time identification of threats saves response time from actual breach
• Third-party needed to be leveraged to help configure Attivo BOTsink

Incentivized

• Internet security is a gamble. It's hard to know the cost of a "would-be" attack. FortiDeceptor is basically an insurance policy and for that, it is a great investment.

Incentivized