What users are saying about
2 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9 out of 100
67 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.8 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Autostub

I can't think of any situation where API development/integration is involved and Autostub is not suitable for the job. Any developer at some point may need to mock the APIs somewhere in the product lifecycle, and having a specialized tool like Autostub make this process so much easier and more maintainable.
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Micro Focus LoadRunner

HP LoadRunner is well suited where we need to create a number of VUsers for testing application's performance. It's one of the best tools for application performance testing. It can integrate with most of CRM / ERP systems and thus provides wide applicability. The monitoring and analysis interface is user-friendly, thus providing the users with the application health and status quickly.However, it's not required for use if the application is not very complex or if the business enterprise is small / medium. Also, though the tool is efficient, additional cost apart from the license is required to purchase other modules and it is expensive if 24x7 support is required.
Suhas Kashyap RR | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

Load Testing

Autostub
8.8
Micro Focus LoadRunner
6.7
End to end performance management
Autostub
9.0
Micro Focus LoadRunner
7.7
Integrated performance data
Autostub
9.0
Micro Focus LoadRunner
7.7
Deployment model flexibility
Autostub
9.0
Micro Focus LoadRunner
6.1
Real time monitoring
Autostub
8.0
Micro Focus LoadRunner
6.1
Automated anomaly detection
Autostub
Micro Focus LoadRunner
6.1

Pros

Autostub

  • Automatically generating stubs for REST and SOAP
  • Managing multiple mock responses for each service if needed
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Micro Focus LoadRunner

  • It can simulate multiple users at the same time and help understand the performance.
  • It can generate excellent reports and give insights into application performance.
  • It is a fast tool and does not take time to perform its functions.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Autostub

  • None, the experience was excellent
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Micro Focus LoadRunner

  • HP LoadRunner with new patches and releases sometimes makes no longer support older version of various protocols like Citrix, which makes the task time-consuming when using older versions of LoadRunner for some of the cases. So it should support older version as well while upgrading.
  • Configuring HP LoadRunner over the firewall involves lots of configuration and may be troublesome. So, there should be a script (power shell script for Windows or shell script for Linux users) to make it easy to use and with less pain.
  • I would like to see the RunTime Viewer of Vugen in HPLoadRunner based on the browser I selected in the run-time configuration to make it feel more realistic as a real user.
  • Licensing cost is very high when we need to perform a test on application for a specific group of users.
Mayank Thirani | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Autostub

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Micro Focus LoadRunner

Micro Focus LoadRunner 3.0
Based on 2 answers
Customer service is not that great. It's difficult to get hold of someone if an issue is supposed to be addressed on an urgent basis. No online chat service readily available.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Autostub

The automatic generation of stub services feature exists in SoapUI but only for SOAP APIs. Also, Autostub is much more usable and friendly, supports REST APIs as well as SOAP, and is offered as a SAAS, On-Prem or hybrid deployment whereas SoapUI needs to be run on a server with no cloud option
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Micro Focus LoadRunner

HP performance center stacks up very well for front end applications. Need more improvements for API performance testing.
Anil Kumar Moka | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Autostub

  • Saved a lot of time for developers and testers that would be spent creating mock services
  • Enabled improving CI/CD pipelines with centralized mocks for all needed services
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Micro Focus LoadRunner

  • The scripts created with traditional web/http protocol are not robust thus re-scripting is required after most every code drop. Troubleshooting and fixing the issue takes more time therefore in most cases we do re-scripting to keep it simple and save time.
  • In ideal world you would rather spend more time doing testing than scripting in that case mostly you could use an Ajax TruClient protocol. This type of script will only fail when an object in the application is removed or changed completely. This way of scripting will save you more time and helps you maintain the scripts with less re-work effort on a release basis. On the long run you will have a better ROI when you use Ajax TruClient protocol for scripting.
Pradeepan Anthony | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Micro Focus LoadRunner

Pricing Details

Autostub

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Micro Focus LoadRunner

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

Autostub
10.0
Micro Focus LoadRunner
8.0

Support Rating

Autostub
Micro Focus LoadRunner
3.0

Add comparison