Azure DevOps vs. MindManager vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure DevOps
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Azure DevOps (formerly VSTS, Microsoft Visual Studio Team System) is an agile development product that is an extension of the Microsoft Visual Studio architecture. Azure DevOps includes software development, collaboration, and reporting capabilities.
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
MindManager
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
MindManager is a mind mapping and project management tool that aims to boost users’ productivity. It is designed to facilitate a wide range of project types, and includes cross-platform functionality and 3rd party integrations.
$105
per year
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Editions & Modules
Azure Artifacts
$2
per GB (first 2GB free)
Basic Plan
$6
per user per month (first 5 users free)
Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted
$15
per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)
Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted
$40
per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
Basic + Test Plan
$52
per user per month
MindManager for Microsoft Teams
$105
per year
Annual Subscription
$179
per year
Organizations
Contact sales team
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Considered Multiple Products
Azure DevOps
Chose Azure DevOps
ADO has better linking than Confluence and is adaptable for a specific need, whereas Confluence might be a bit more rigid, but it's also sort of along the same lines as to what can be done with both tools. ADO also had an ease of use to it and can do a bunch of stuff with it, …
Chose Azure DevOps
Mind manager has additional components which allow you to not just map out process workflows but also project plan.
MindManager
Chose MindManager
Miro: have not evaluated before. I find Miro more cumbersome than MindManager. MindManager was easier to pick up.
Chose MindManager
Each does very similar things. I like Miro because it is very easy to allow anyone to collaborate without having to have a file saved anywhere. Visio is great if you have spent a lot of time learning the ins and outs of it. I prefer Mind Manager for presentation and …
Chose MindManager
I have known and followed MindManager developments since 2000 and maintain my knowledge base. I even used it to create my wheel of life based on the Indian model and would also like to use the MM in a VR version. No tool offers comparable holistic functions - as well as - 25 …
Chose MindManager
It had more business functionality as integrated well with ms office tools. Other two tools have their own benefits.
Chose MindManager
MindManager has many functions that others don't allow. Users can also use it offline rather than relying on an internal connection. It works with many standard business software programs that other products do not. This makes it very applicable for the workplace, as it helps …
Chose MindManager
MindManager excels in visualizing complex ideas and projects through interactive mind maps and flowcharts, making it superior to traditional list-based tools. Its intuitive interface, robust features like task management, and integration with various platforms streamline …
Chose MindManager
Word in Outline view creates outlines but it is not possible to add pictures nor keep it in a coherent tree presentation.
Powerpoint are individual slides where the audience see only the current slides without looking at its relation with all other topics. When deploying a …
Chose MindManager
It is different from other project management software because it is easy to use and can be used by just about anyone. With its intuitive interface, you can create mind maps and brainstorm up to four levels of notes and ideas. It has over 50 predefined shapes to capture your …
Chose MindManager
MindManager is software that you can install on your computer and you can trust that your information is safe and confidential. Other similar products use open website platforms that store the information in clouds and you can't really control who has access to the information …
Miro
Chose Miro
MindManager comes closer to the wide set of business visuals that Miro.com can create. MindMeister is more a pure mind mapping tool but it comes closer to Miro.com on the scale of online, collaboration and integration with online platforms.
Chose Miro
Miro can help with PI Planning and Retrospectives, similar to ADO, but offers more collaboration and interactivity.
Chose Miro
Miro was a big hit with all the teams involved, it was easy to stand up and start using, easy to license, and easy to manage. Other tools offered stronger connections to tools in their product suite without the freedom and ease of use that Miro did.
Chose Miro
I didn't make the decision in my company to use Miro, but I've used Mural in school and prefer Miro. Funcitonally, they're very similar, but I feel like Miro is more polished. However, Miro is the first tool I've used and the one I've used the most, so I'm a little bit biased.
Chose Miro
Miro has a different purpose from Figma, so I don't see them as similar. It would be interesting to see better integration for the workflow there.
Chose Miro
We use a lot of products, each have their advantage. Miro has the best templates and also provides the best training. Lucid has some better data centre hosting location options and also account management team is very good.
Chose Miro
Whilst I initially found that there was some parity between Miro and Mural, the iterations and updates since have found me favouring Miro a lot more. Whilst the templates available with Mural were incredibly useful, I find that the quality of life changes and UI / UX tweaks …
Chose Miro
I prefer Miro to Figma because it "feels" like a good fit for the way my brain works. The UI is smooth and the tooling is intuitive.
Chose Miro
Miro offers a more user-friendly Ux/Ui, and it is far easier to work on content collaboratively at the same time. Visio does have the upper hand in snapping objects and connections to some kind of grid which improves organization. Miro also does allow for exporting of frames …
Chose Miro
Miro has more visualization tools, capabilities, and better ease of use than others I have tried.
Chose Miro
Microsoft’s tools are useful but delegate in utility, and Miro brings those many things into one app.
Chose Miro
Miro seems to do so much more than the other apps, makes it way easier and intuitive to use. It can be as simple or complex as I need it to be.
Chose Miro
Miro is much better. It offers the best of these tools and much more. As a direct comparison, it's significantly better than Mural.

As a tool, it's pretty unique and the powerful integrations put in a league of its own. Miro is my go to tool in this regard.
Chose Miro
I was part of recommending a whiteboarding solution to my organization, where we considered five vendors, including Miro. Miro’s superior UI, SSO integration, pricing structure, support and training, and simplistic admin management were The determinating factors that made Miro …
Chose Miro
Miro works well with each of these other apps but we use these other apps to fill the gaps that Miro doesn't currently fill.
Chose Miro
Miro is easier to use than either Figma or ClickUp for communicating in this way. We still use Figma to generate high-resolution comps, but Miro has a lower entry bar for usage. ClickUp is trying to do too many things. Miro allows beginner and advanced users to get up and …
Chose Miro
I used Miro before and I’m used to it now. I also pay for a personal licence. I’m getting familiar with Kahoot.
Chose Miro
I also tried Microsoft Whiteboard. Miro's quality far surpasses ANY other product in its category in terms of robust features, ease of including board collaborators, and the vast collection of available templates.
Chose Miro
Regarding TeamRetro, Miro gives much wider possibility to create and edit retrospective boards.
Jira is an excellent tool as well, if you have enough money to acquire all the necessary addons. I think Miro is overall a good and competitive tool for Jira as well, though more …
Chose Miro
I used MURAL as it is a required tool for an online learning program. Using Miro is my organization's decision and I like it. Its integration and features are richer than MURAL.
Features
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Mind Mapping
Comparison of Mind Mapping features of Product A and Product B
Azure DevOps
-
Ratings
MindManager
7.5
70 Ratings
1% above category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Cross-Platform Compatibility00 Ratings7.455 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Templates00 Ratings7.764 Ratings00 Ratings
Import and Export Options00 Ratings7.265 Ratings00 Ratings
Real-time Collaboration Tools00 Ratings6.849 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-Drop Capabilities00 Ratings8.960 Ratings00 Ratings
Notes and Attachments00 Ratings7.763 Ratings00 Ratings
Color and Style Customization00 Ratings7.864 Ratings00 Ratings
Presentation Mode00 Ratings7.456 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Task Management00 Ratings6.951 Ratings00 Ratings
Mind Map Revision History00 Ratings7.042 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
Whimsical
Whimsical
Score 9.3 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(69 ratings)
8.0
(256 ratings)
9.1
(6068 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(3 ratings)
8.9
(24 ratings)
9.4
(185 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(9 ratings)
8.3
(19 ratings)
8.6
(451 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(7 ratings)
9.5
(20 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
8.1
(11 ratings)
7.5
(16 ratings)
7.7
(63 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(6 ratings)
9.0
(3659 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
8.6
(14 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(4 ratings)
8.1
(4001 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
8.7
(19 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(5 ratings)
6.5
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(5 ratings)
5.9
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure DevOpsMindManagerMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure DevOps works well when you’ve got larger delivery efforts with multiple teams and a lot of moving parts, and you need one place to plan work, track it properly, and see how everything links together. It’s especially useful when delivery and development are closely tied and you want backlog items, code and releases connected rather than spread across tools. Where it’s less of a fit is for small teams or simple pieces of work, as it can feel like more setup and process than you really need, and non-technical users often struggle with the interface. It also isn’t great if you want instant, easy programme-level views or a very visual planning experience without putting time into configuration.
Read full review
Alludo
It is well suited for a quick prototype of product/development planning to show relationships amongst the APIs used. This helps developers understand the impact of the product changes and identifies the need to update integration components to avoid erroneous deployments. I have not personally experienced a less appropriate scenario at the moment.
Read full review
Miro
Miro is a comprehensive visual collaboration solution that suits companies of any size thanks to its amazing capabilities. It will allow your team members to brainstorm and share ideas in real-time. You will enjoy how this visual collaboration solution will boost collaboration in your company. It is easy to implement.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Utilize Git as a repository to share work between multiple users
  • Ability to configure Pipelines to build containers to run virtual deployments and testing scripts.
  • Split individual tasks and relate to master documents for quick navigation and ability to see overall picture of project.
  • Track status of each task
  • Integrate with Git to utilize branches, merging, approvals, history, etc.
Read full review
Alludo
  • Allows me to learn by organizing notes.
  • Enables me to create and present strategic plans.
  • Empowers me to present complex concepts in a different and straightforward way.
  • Captivates my audience when I prepare and present a conference, a class, or a seminar in MindManager.
  • Allows me to share mind maps in a variety of formats like JPG, PDF, and HTML.
Read full review
Miro
  • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
  • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
  • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
  • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • I did mention it has good visibility in terms of linking, but sometimes items do get lost, so if there was a better way to manage that, that would be great.
  • The wiki is not the prettiest thing to look at, so it could have refinements there.
  • It could improve the search slightly better.
Read full review
Alludo
  • There should be some more functionality in the Notes window, such as a "Paste Special " Icon in the notes area to maintain format control.
  • Although I create many of my own Web export templates, an add-on for web export design would be great, as I regularly create Interactive Electronic Technical Publications (IETP) in HTML export format.
  • The ability to sync Map shortcuts between devices would also be welcome. I use MM on three devices, and I have to add or amend the Map list individually. My maps are on OneDrive, so using them should not be that hard if they are cloud-based.
Read full review
Miro
  • As a designer, I miss some more creative features. I can't even get really into designing small things (like paths). Many of my colleagues have already switched to the Figma board because it is possible there.
  • Things often get lost in the workflow, especially in teams. Working on the same file often leads to misunderstandings and can be frustrating. For example, if text is accidentally deleted and cannot be recovered, or if images become distorted.
  • The scale on the board is missing, which often leads to size differences.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.
Read full review
Alludo
I feel the main issues of the old Mindjet seem to be gone with the
Corel purchase. With the huge advance of sharing via browser HTML even 1
user can affect many. And, actually, using MM kind of forced my rigid
brain to rethink how I categorize and classify information/projects.
The
idea of paying $69USD for an annual cost is more than fair and a great
model for Corel/Mindjet to keep rolling out improvements!
Read full review
Miro
Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
It's a great help to get more information about new feature release and stay updated on what the dev team is working on. I like how easy it is to just login and read through the work items. Each work item has basic details: Title, Description, Assigned to, State, Area (what it belongs to), and iteration (when it’s worked on). See image above.They move through different states (New → Discovery → Ready for Prod → etc.).
Read full review
Alludo
MindManager is very intuitive. The user interface is not cluttered and the ribbon icons are easy to understand. Several excellent "how-to" videos are available on the MindManager site as well as on YouTube. MindManager starts quickly and the user interface is very responsive. Launching other programs from MindManager such as Excel is very fast and issue free. The browsing feature is lightning fast. The drag-and-drop capability is also very fast and reliable.
Read full review
Miro
I love it. It should perhaps even be a 10, but there are only minor things that get me when it comes to trying to move around the images on the page and selecting images on the page. Nevertheless, I've used this tool randomly over various years numerous times.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alludo
We have had no issues with the application's availability
Read full review
Miro
I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alludo
The application is quick and responsive. We are able to produce mindmaps and reports with ease. The program is not complicated at all and integrates well with software and programs like Microsoft Outlook and Teams, which we truly appreciate.
Read full review
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.
Read full review
Alludo
I have called technical support a few times. During the COVID Crisis, I called a few times repeatedly due to a rush request. The technical support guy called me back in minutes. He somehow knew that I had called repeatedly and wanted to make sure my issue was resolved immediately
Read full review
Miro
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alludo
The videos are not well categorized...I had to do a bit of digging to get what I wanted and many videos on older versions. If Mindjet was to improve the titles used that would help.
Read full review
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Was not part of the process.
Read full review
Alludo
better backup and exporting functions
Read full review
Miro
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Planner is used by project managers and IT service managers across our organization for task tracking and running their team meetings. Azure DevOps works better than Planner for software development teams but might possibly be too complex for non-software teams or more business-focused projects. We also use ServiceNow for IT service management and this tool provides better analysis and tracking of IT incidents, as Azure DevOps is more suited to development and project work for dev teams.
Read full review
Alludo
MindManager stands out for its wide range of export options, customization and how they have enriched the format over time. As a constantly evolving tool, and having tried others, I consider it superior for the abovementioned reasons. Its cross-platform nature has been decisive, and although there are many alternatives in the form of web applications or the like, MindManager presents itself as a more complete and robust option.
Read full review
Miro
I use both for different things really. Figma is better for design and prototype applications with coding being enabled in Figma (which isn't part of Miro's tools). As I said earlier, I use other programmes when there is a lack in Miro, in this case the coding element. Also Miro is better suited for BAU, so I can utilise this by bringing part of the business into using it. Figma isn't collaborative enough for this purpose. Miro overall has a better user experience
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alludo
A team can collaborate on the same project but cannot create a shared project file. It would be helpful for that feature to be added.
Read full review
Miro
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We have saved a ton of time not calculating metrics by hand.
  • We no longer spend time writing out cards during planning, it goes straight to the board.
  • We no longer track separate documents to track overall department goals. We were able to create customized icons at the department level that lets us track each team's progress against our dept goals.
Read full review
Alludo
  • For a single person business presentation it is a plus.
  • Project difficulty is well assessed using the map.
  • Giving away a paper version of a map is a positive gesture. People like the map, the look, and what it says, and it may also be a way to promote MindManager to them.
  • Keep the PDF or JPEG saving capabilities for small customers like me. It's important.
Read full review
Miro
  • Offer infinite canvas that allow me to brainstorm, organize ideas and think visually.
  • Effective for creating prototypes and wireframes, which saves time, reduces back-and-forth, and prevents costly mistakes.
  • Features like mind mapping, kanban boards, and flowcharts help me to visualize complex projects easily.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MindManager Screenshots

Screenshot of MindmapScreenshot of Reverse BrainstormingScreenshot of MindManager for Microsoft TeamsScreenshot of MindManager SnapScreenshot of MindManager GoScreenshot of Mind Maps in MindManager

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.