Catchpoint vs. New Relic

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Catchpoint
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Catchpoint is an Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) and Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) platform designed to provide visibility into the entire "Internet Stack"—from local user devices to global network infrastructure. Following its acquisition by LogicMonitor in December 2025, the platform is being integrated as a core component of the LM Envision observability suite to bridge the gap between internal infrastructure health and external user experience.N/A
New Relic
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
New Relic is a SaaS-based web and mobile application performance management provider for the cloud and the datacenter. They provide code-level diagnostics for dedicated infrastructures, the cloud, or hybrid environments and real time monitoring.
$0
No credit card required; 100 GB free ingest per month, 1 free full user + unlimited basic users, 8 days retention, 100 Synthetics Checks
Pricing
CatchpointNew Relic
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free (Forever)
$0
No credit card required; 100 GB free ingest per month, 1 free full user + unlimited basic users, 8 days retention, 100 Synthetics Checks
Telemetry Data Platform
$0.25
per month per extra GB data ingest (after first free 100GB per month)
Incident Intelligence
$0.50
per month per event (after first 1000 free events per month)
Standard
$99
per month per full user (after first free full user - unlimited free basic users)
Pro
Contact sales team
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CatchpointNew Relic
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details- White glove migration services - Annual subscription - Professional Services - Competitive Benchmarking
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CatchpointNew Relic
Considered Both Products
Catchpoint
Chose Catchpoint
First thing we can have the enterprise nodes so that we can get real insights form the Catchpoint before customers.
Also Root cause analysis with detailed report and troubleshooting.
We can create custom dashboards and we can visualize thing and able to find the issue while …
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint is instrumental in helping diverse tech stack across hundreds of regions of the organization in cost efficient way.
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint is mimicing human to test by the steps. It is very different. It can see each step's performance. In Dynatrace I have used, it is more like backend monitoring, it won't be able to let you design based on your use case.
Chose Catchpoint
DataDog is good, but more expensive. New Relic is good but does not provide the same features as Catchpoint does. Checkly is good, but Catchpoint offers different frameworks to create synthetic tests, which is preferable to my engineering team.
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint stood out for its synthetic monitoring depth, real user insights, and internet/network performance monitoring, making it ideal for businesses reliant on global digital services.
Chose Catchpoint
We see limited options while adding tests on mentioned compared to CP.
Chose Catchpoint
Compare Catchpoint with the side score, Catchpoint gives us some more feasibility regarding monetary as point provides both agent based and agent less monitoring, but side to provide us some agent with monetary, so that’s the major difference between both these tools. Also …
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint doesn't have a feature set that is as full but can provide many similar features for much less.
Chose Catchpoint
I have not used any other product similar to Catchpoint, or we can say I never felt the need to check out other products.
Chose Catchpoint
Lightweight and efficient for Production environment monitoring
Chose Catchpoint
Datadog, Prometheus, Kibana and OpenTelemetry
Chose Catchpoint
More specialties and locations.
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint is great for Synthetic monitoring, alerting, general internet reporting, and fully understanding all types of data around edge services. They don't do a lot of internal tracing or application monitoring right now, but we have leveraged their Enterprise servers within …
Chose Catchpoint
Smart Bear Foglight Dynatrace CEM Catchpoint: I have used many synthetic monitoring products. Honestly, there are no big differences in features among all the products listed above or that I have used before. Probably, price and support might play big roles in selecting the …
Chose Catchpoint
In my opinion Catchpoint has not lost focus on synthetics like Dynatrace has. Catchpoint is increasing investment in its core monitoring network, while Dynatrace has shut down its backbone monitoring network.
Chose Catchpoint
I feel Catchpoint's synthetic monitoring stacks up against them all and I personally feel more comfortable in creating our observability in Catchpoint. They have a detailed documentation for each keyword you come across in their portal that really helps a lot. And ofcourse, the …
Chose Catchpoint
Mainly was the extremely high availability across the whole world. Especially China.
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint as a product provides comprehensive tools to help orchestrate real-world synthetic monitoring capabilities. Coding & payload development language easy to use and manage. The user management features could use some additional features to help make managing user & …
Chose Catchpoint
Both products are similar and have similar challenges but the Dynatrace pricing model is not as competitive as Catchpoint.
Chose Catchpoint
Catchpoint offers similar capabilities with better pricing.
New Relic
Chose New Relic
Before start using New Relic, we had a custom Grafana monitoring tool configured for our clients. Altough functional, it took too much time to add new alerts and monitoring features. New Relic is way easier and simpler to to configure and saves us a lot of time spent not only …
Chose New Relic
Data Dog has solutions that look more attractive, but not at their price point. We have also tried to build a solution straight from the Cloud, where our business is built, but some things are too hard to replicate. This shows that New Relic is useful and helps our efficiency.
Chose New Relic
New Relic continuously focusing on Open Telemetry and agentic AI integrations which is helping users to focus on the latest technology and as we all know that in future Observability will be mostly on OTel concept and AI driven and New Relic focusing on those area.
Apart from …
Chose New Relic
The main reason is its pricing models which is value for money with respect to its features and it supports the OTEL related integrations which helps us to adopt the updations of Otel very easily and also it gives us flexible to drop the data in different stages through the …
Chose New Relic
Its covers all the observability aspects as well as giving us more competitive pricing models compared to other providers that's why I like to use New Relic in place of other tools. And also it introduces new Agentic AI features as well as it adopts AI in its RCA. As an …
Chose New Relic
Tracing of the services calls between the entire components in the architecture is good and easy to understand.
Dashboarding building process is simple.
UI is simple.
Chose New Relic
Prometheus, Grafana, Grafana Loki and Elasticsearch
Chose New Relic
New Relic has full stack visibility and gives us all options for observability like one stop shop. It gives you front end, backend as well synthetic monitoring capabilities.

Every other feature built into one cost model (usually) which ties to data that you send, it helps you …
Chose New Relic
New Relic stood out to us primarily because of its all-in one approach, combining APM, infra monitoring, logs and alerts in single platform. Compared to other tools we evaluated, if offered a smoother on boarding experience and required less stitching together of different …
Chose New Relic
Because of its easy to use, its good features, value for money.
Chose New Relic
Less expensive than datadog and sentry with almost everything we need. Less effort to set up and maintain than elastic search and kibana so saved a ton on engineering bandwidth which would have otherwise been lost.
Chose New Relic
Solarwinds was good until they migrated to a new kind of offering and discounting the old product making it more expensive and less flexible for our specific use-case.
The free trial also helped me try and get started without needing to commit.
I think right now New Relic is the …
Chose New Relic
New Relic is the easiest to adopt, the price is in line with the other tools, and it has the lowest threshold to cross in order to learn the system and the platform. Adopting OpenTelemetry has been helpful in getting data aligned, and their documentation has been sufficient for …
Chose New Relic
The New Relic Platform addresses this challenge with the new plugin architecture. Plugins provide a way to monitor each of these technologies, extending the New Relic interface with custom-made dashboards specific to each. They pair the reporting of metrics specific to the …
Chose New Relic
We selected TrackJS for error monitoring and New Relic for site speed monitoring. TrackJS is a much easier to use tool for JS error monitoring, so we never ended up consolidating tools or moving over to New Relic permanently. We use New Relic for site speed monitoring and …
Chose New Relic
New Relic is the most full-featured offering that we've found, and is incredibly easy to start using with a PHP app. The New Relic agent is installed as a PHP extension so it is able to monitor and track the performance of any PHP app being run by the web server. Other tools …
Chose New Relic
At the time, we selected New Relic for the broad coverage it could provide over our landscape.
Chose New Relic
New Relic is used by developers and support teams at our organisation - Splunk is used more in security monitoring by our SecOps team - not sure how they might compare doing the same job
Chose New Relic
Similar features, the New Relic data ingestion costs are better and UI better as well
Chose New Relic
New Relic in my opinion is a lot better than a tool like Datadog and Splunk. Cost in my opinion is the biggest concern.
Chose New Relic
The overlap is not large, but the one advantage of the speed curve is retention: data is available permanently, which allows you to investigate the hypothesis with data collected before formulating the hypothesis. This has proven very effective for us.
Best Alternatives
CatchpointNew Relic
Small Businesses
SolarWinds Pingdom
SolarWinds Pingdom
Score 8.2 out of 10
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ThousandEyes
Cisco ThousandEyes
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Nexthink
Nexthink
Score 7.4 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CatchpointNew Relic
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CatchpointNew Relic
Likelihood to Recommend
Proactive Website and API performance testing, Synthetic monitoring, and third-party integration are where Catchpoint is best suited. Catchpoint is less appropriate in Deep Application Performance monitoring, debugging complex user journeys in real-time, Small businesses, and Mobile app performance monitoring. These are the scenarios where I find Catchpoint is well-suited and scenarios where it is less appropriate.
Read full review
I have used New Relic in different scenarios like monitoring my production infrastructure and applications which helps us to reduce the downtime of my applications and websites and also I have used the synthetic monitoring feature which helps to proactively monitor our websites availability. Along with this I have also used New Relic for cloud resources cost monitoring which helps to reduce my cloud cost. Also I have used mobile application monitoring which helps me to trace the sessions easily and I can easily reduce my RCA through the help of that.
Read full review
Pros
  • Catchpoint Synthetics: We create our synthetic monitoring using catchpoint. Creating the synthetics monitors are easy and requires basic knowledge on selenium and javascript. It allows you to run the test from external(backbone) and internal enterprise nodes. The screenshot and filmstrip feature is an add-on along with various customisations. Once created, It provides a detailed insight of each request that is involved in the application flow which helps us in addressing the issue at the request level.
  • Catchpoint API Test: This is another kind of test which we have explored in our organisation. This has helped us to maintain the health check of our APIs and also we have utilised it for a variety of our use cases.
  • Catchpoint Dashboard: This is our one-stop shop for all our monitors. It has multiple widgets that displays various application performance metrics. We use this feature immensely and it is of great value to the business.
  • Catchpoint UI: It is very user friendly and with basic introduction anyone can just get started with it.
Read full review
  • New Relic APM allows us to follow up transactions across services and trace performance bottlenecks in real-time, crucial when monitoring the processing of energy loads or predictive maintenance algorithms.
  • It gives us deep visibility into our cloud servers, containers and IOT gateways, so we can catch CPU spikes or memory leaks which can impact the data we ingest from the field devices.
  • We develop custom dashboards for monitoring trends of power consumption, abnormality in sensors and API health. In conjunction with alerting, it makes sure we are fixing issues before customers even see them.
Read full review
Cons
  • The ability to monitor the Catchpoint nodes with the ability to setup a take a recovery action based on specific criteria
  • The ability to tell us when we are at X% capacity so that we better plan or budget for increasing the "capacity" of the Catchpoint nodes before we get to an overloaded state. The capacity utilization graph is not a reliable indicator for this metric. How can the capacity utilization rate get above 100%, it does not make sense
Read full review
  • Support for SQL like query with more functional features of analysis while viewing distributed tracing.
  • support for very low level specific integration from APIs to classes to functions to piece of code
  • More detailed documentation, as we faced issues while integrating for the first time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It’s a good solution, which I am using for many different reasons and it demonstrates enough potential to allow me to detect internet routing issues, ISP issues, regional outages before they impact my solutions, giving me the tools that I need to provide the best service that I can to my clients.
Read full review
I have not yet found any similar product that offers me this range of features to help us keep our online service fast and reliable. Besides this, New Relic is constantly evolving by adding new plugins to emerging technologies and platforms. Server performance measuring features are a key point as our user database grows.
Read full review
Usability
It's hard to find the functionalities that I am looking for in the application. Even if I did something in the past, after a time I have to re-learn again where the functionalities are. This is a powerful tool, but not user-friendly. Texts in the buttons and menus are not always meaningful or easily comprehensible.
Read full review
I have given this much rating as I am used New Relic in different sectors and for different use cases like its K8s monitoring, infra monitoring, full stack monitoring as compare to other tools New Relic gives data in a formatted and connected way, and also it is giving us value for money. It also launches new features day by day which helps users to track the issue very quickly. It also supports OTel integrations which is the latest trend of observability tools. thats why I had given this much rating to New Relic.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Never observed an outage
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Always responsive. Never observed slow page loads
Read full review
Support Rating
The customer support is fantastic as they keep you updated and follow up even though we may not even follow up. Make sure they send a communication so that we remain updated. They value engineers who will get on a call with you to understand any requirement we have on any test, and they bring in the best developers on call.
Read full review
The support team has been really helpful and resolved most of the issues on time. However, for a couple of issues, several follow-ups were needed to elicit a reasonable response. The issue was deeply technical and could have been investigated only by their Architects, and bringing them into the ticket took longer than needed
Read full review
Implementation Rating
very easy to implement as the product is user-friendly
Read full review
The documentation was clear and concise; the only issue we ran into was custom application naming. Due to HTTPD mod_fcgid and the need for the application name to be set in php.ini (not in .htaccess or the virtual host directive) ... we had issues setting this up.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Smart Bear Foglight Dynatrace CEM Catchpoint: I have used many synthetic monitoring products. Honestly, there are no big differences in features among all the products listed above or that I have used before. Probably, price and support might play big roles in selecting the products. I do not know the prices of these products.
Read full review
Before start using New Relic, we had a custom Grafana monitoring tool configured for our clients. Altough functional, it took too much time to add new alerts and monitoring features. New Relic is way easier and simpler to to configure and saves us a lot of time spent not only on configuration, but also keeping the service working.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Agent deployment is easily integrated into our workflow. Adding the agent to new servers is quick and painless
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Catchpoint points based licensing for public hosted nodes is complicated and unpredictable in points required.
  • Catchpoint lacks AI powered anomaly detection and automated remediation. This gap means more manual triage and slower MTTR during incidents.
  • The advanced 360 degree blackbox monitoring is enabling us to monitor the APIs, UI and proactively gain insights into the application behavior and performance before customer is impacted.
Read full review
  • We spend six figures on this solution to avoid costs of a broken website.
  • We could save more on cloud services (GCP, Azure, AWS) if New Relic allowed its licenses to be purchased through other marketplaces.
  • New Relic handles some of the same operations that higher priced competitors do.
Read full review
ScreenShots