TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Catchpoint

Score8.8 out of 10

127 Reviews and Ratings

Learn More

Contact about Catchpoint

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Catchpoint Systems Inc

Connect with Catchpoint Systems Inc

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Catchpoint Systems Inc so that Catchpoint Systems Inc and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Catchpoint Review Powerful Digital Experience Monitoring with Deep Network Insights.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Catchpoint for proactive monitoring of application performance, availability, and user experience. It helps us detect and resolve issues before they impact users, optimize service reliability, and monitor third-party dependencies. Our use case includes synthetic monitoring, real user monitoring (RUM), API monitoring, and cloud/network performance tracking, ensuring seamless digital operations.

Pros

  • Synthetic Monitoring.
  • Real User Monitoring.
  • Network & Cloud Performance Monitoring.
  • Root Cause Analysis & Alerting.

Cons

  • Complex Setup & Configuration.
  • Alerting Noise & Customization.
  • Dashboard Customization & UX.

Return on Investment

  • Reduced Downtime & Faster Incident Resolution.
  • Improved User Experience & Retention.
  • Cost Savings Through Performance Optimization.

Alternatives Considered

New Relic and Datadog

Other Software Used

Atlassian Jira, Nagios XI, OpsGenie

Proud to recommend Catchpoint

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

In our organization, we use them for synthetic monitoring . Across all of our apps and data centers. We are global and have a many apps and Catchpoint is a great part of our performance monitoring systems.

Pros

  • reliable
  • great service
  • awesome innovation
  • CEO visionary

Return on Investment

  • ROI
  • ongoing features to meet needs
  • expansion of footprint

Catchpoint Review

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Catchpoint to conduct transaction/playwright tests, and monitor the performance, by using different nodes across all over the world. We care about around-the-world coverage, and the performance differences. This is how the Catchpoint meets our use case, and we utilize nodes locations, and detail waterfall chart to understand the performance overall.

Pros

  • node location
  • easy to write the script
  • no downtime
  • details of the performance
  • good chart/visualization

Cons

  • Scripts, like transaction and playwright, not stable
  • very easy to fail my case, without legit reason
  • no version control, this is a huge pain point for me
  • lack of organizations of the project

Return on Investment

  • fewer outages
  • very easy to identify the issue of performance bottleneck

Alternatives Considered

Dynatrace

Other Software Used

Dynatrace, Jenkins

Catchpoint provides excellent platform solutions

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Site performance across 23 D2C consumer sites in the US and on-demand content performance metrics. We use Catchpoint to give us directional data on tech and content development in order to optimize the customer experience and maximize conversion and engagement.

Pros

  • Performance analysis
  • Network bottlenecks
  • Content analysis

Cons

  • Documentation on automation
  • Simplify/clarify dashboards to make discovery easier

Return on Investment

  • Positive impact on customer engagement and conversion
  • Positive impact on site performance/speed across all company verticals

Other Software Used

Glassbox, Bazaarvoice

Catchpoint- the right tool for Synthetic Tests and more

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Catchpoint to perform synthetic checks of different (SasS) platforms in different regions. The business problem that Catchpoint addresses is the observability of a SaaS application from different regions, providing us with a lot of details such as availability, web response time, latency in different regions. If a problem/alert happens, it notifies the specified teams that will start to investigate why the problem/alert was triggered, which helps to minimize the time to get the right people to work and fix a production problem.

Pros

  • Catchpoint is really good at synthetic tests from edge, as it contains checks for DNS resolution, certificate expiration, api monitoring and more.
  • Catchpoint is also good in performance troubleshooting, helping to identify where the slowness is (in my cloud or in my customer ISP) as well as identify where package loss begins/happens.
  • Catchpoint is also good on capturing end-user page load results and present perfomance metrics that helps the engineering teams to identify and solve them properly.
  • The past thing that I know that Catchpoint can do, but I am not using it, is to integrate with my Incident Response Team to help pinpoint the issue quickly. But its something that my team is investigating.

Cons

  • The UI is not very intuitive and requires a few tries to understand where you can find the feature that you are looking for.
  • The performance metrics from synthetic tests are good, but sometimes it provides the wrong information, for example the web response time gets confused with the time of the test is self and I would like to see a report with the URLs that were used per step in the test and web response time that was taken in each one of the URLs, per region.

Return on Investment

  • Positive impact: to identify the web response time per region, and in which URL takes the most to load. That is super important when identifying performance in the UI and fix them.
  • Positive impact: to identify a big latency in one region which was just used a canary to observe its usage/behaviour first, and after a few hours we could see it was not going as expected.

Alternatives Considered

Datadog, New Relic and Checkly

Other Software Used

Datadog