Covercy vs. Navatar

I believe that any small to medium size real investment firm could benefit from using Covercy as it reduces headcount and helps to streamline lots of back-office tasks. Probably for big firms those functions are fully staffed so they can do that in-house.

Incentivized

• Distributions to clients are easy and straightforward
• Customer service is quick to respond
• Updating and adding new assets is very easy

Incentivized

• Covercy could benefit from enhanced report and dashboard customization options to better cater to the specific analytical needs of different organizations.

Incentivized

I rarely have any downtime with Covercy. When there are any issues, I can email support and they usually get back to me within a day.

Incentivized

I believe that Covercy is the only solution that is currently allowing Real Estate firms to distribute funds to their investors directly through the platform. Also, both other solutions are pretty expensive compared to the reasonable pricing that Covercy has in place (function of a number of properties rather than AuM or other methods).

Incentivized

• The ROI I can provide is for time management. It saves us at least 2 days' worth of work each quarter on capital distributions alone, and at least 30 minutes on each report distribution. Not to mention the amount of time it saves us on fielding client questions regarding their capital because they can just log in and see everything on their portal.

Incentivized