Dayforce is a people platform that simplifies HR operations. As a unified HCMS, it delivers HR, payroll, benefits, workforce management, talent, and analytics—helping organizations boost productivity, stay compliant, and make smarter decisions with embedded intelligence and personalized experiences.
N/A
IBM Cognos Analytics
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.
$11.25
per month per user
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft BI is a business intelligence product used for data analysis and generating reports on server-based data. It features unlimited data analysis capacity with its reporting engine, SQL Server Reporting Services alongside ETL, master data management, and data cleansing.
Dayforce HCM is the first multi feature platform I've used. My experience with iCIMS was limited to just the ATS functions. Having payroll, HR, and benefits all rolled into one system has proven to be invaluable in assisting with managing an organization and its daily operations.
IBM is a titan in BI innovation but has arduous competitors as I mentioned before. IBM has prestige in BI and the directors and managers know that. On the other hand, complexity is not the strategy of Cognos, that's why if you need big cubes of data, Tableau, and Microsoft BI …
Microsoft Power BI has a more user friendly interface and it is integrated very well with the other Microsoft products but IBM Cognos Analytics has a more advanced reporting and complex data analysis capabilities.
Cost wise, the above products are less expensive and offer tons more upfront, but you will pay for it on the back end. They have vendor limitations and their support mechanism was inline for what we wanted.
It was cost prohibitive to switch platforms we have a huge investment in our Cognos implementation. There was retooling costs for our resources training costs for our users as well as a million $ plus investment in licensing costs. We could have considered a move to the cloud …
There are a number of reporting systems, but these other systems are really data visualization systems that lack the ability deliver information through an enterprise on their own. IBM Cognos is well suited to be the delivery system for an enterprise's analytics and the …
MS BI: A lot of times we meet customers who are dealing with an MS BI maintenance nightmare and we try to ease their pain by implementing Cognos BI and their reporting and analysis system. Cognos BI is better than MS BI from ease of implementation to production support and …
Cognos has better functionality and it is easier to develop once the package is ready. On the other hand SSRS doesn't need a package, just a connection to DB.
IBM Cognos is a separate product but it allows us to connect to any databases and databases from Microsoft Analysis Services as well. This feature made me choose Cognos.
Each of the solutions has their pros and cons, but Microsoft's BI offerings provide the best "bang for the buck." Few solutions available offer the breadth of feature functionality in a single package, with BI and database generally being sold as separate offerings. However, …
We initially considered Google Analytics, but eventually decided against it due to the licensing terms and the associated software that we would need to incorporate. IBM Cognos is great at what it does, as long as you are trying to integrate with software that is on their …
Specific data displays are some of the strongest aspects of Microsoft BI when compared to alternate programs. It also does a superior job in compatibility with many programs, especially those from Microsoft. Since my company primarily uses Office 365 and other Microsoft …
Microsoft BI is mainly based on Microsoft SQL Server, so it is perfectly integrated. Many of the Microsoft BI components require using SQL Server as the database engine. Generally, the functionalities that are achieved when using SQL Server as a database engine are greater than …
One of the main reasons Microsoft BI was chosen by our company is because it is a reliable program. We tried different programs in the past (and currently also use other ones for certain reporting and analysis needs) but Microsoft BI was the least buggy out of our top choices.
-Tableau is clearly more cutting edge when it comes to data visualization and connecting to multiple data sources (support for MongoDB, Hadoop, etc). -Assuming your data is not that sophisticated, Microsoft BI is a great product. I would say its a good "all around" BI tool. It …
Features
Dayforce
IBM Cognos Analytics
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.1
602 Ratings
0% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
8.8525 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
9.0559 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
9.1549 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
9.1553 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
6.7502 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
6.8548 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
7.4370 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.6
602 Ratings
6% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.1588 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
7.1295 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
9.1154 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.3475 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.1574 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
8.3456 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
8.9309 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.9
547 Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Approval workflow
9.2515 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Balance details
9.0529 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
8.5434 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.2
615 Ratings
0% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
8.5586 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
8.4599 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
View company policy documentation
7.7419 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee recognition
8.9219 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
View job history
7.6492 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.3
103 Ratings
3% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
8.3103 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
6.3
601 Ratings
18% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Report builder
6.5592 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built reports
6.4592 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
6.0416 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.6
394 Ratings
8% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
New hire portal
9.0384 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
8.2338 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.4
257 Ratings
5% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
7.9215 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.9236 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.3201 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
8.6241 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.1
283 Ratings
3% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Performance plans
8.6262 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
8.3225 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.4265 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.2260 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
7.7234 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
8.2
131 Ratings
5% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
9.1104 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.8113 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
7.8118 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
8.3106 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
9.1
302 Ratings
16% above category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
9.5284 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.5277 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
8.9233 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
9.4265 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.8229 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
9.4276 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.4272 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.6
131 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
9.0
53 Ratings
9% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
7.5121 Ratings
8.646 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.8127 Ratings
9.653 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.5123 Ratings
9.051 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.5
131 Ratings
7% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.6
53 Ratings
7% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
6.9128 Ratings
8.648 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.7130 Ratings
8.353 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
7.493 Ratings
8.442 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.2124 Ratings
9.053 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Dayforce
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.2
129 Ratings
0% below category average
Microsoft BI (MSBI)
8.6
52 Ratings
5% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.327 Ratings
9.448 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
7.7123 Ratings
9.248 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.626 Ratings
7.544 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.3125 Ratings
8.647 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
8.112 Ratings
8.626 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
I think Dayforce is a great option for a large and/or Global organization. I do not think it would be the best fit for a very small company or business. It really shines for enterprise organizations with multi-locations. While a small business could use it, I would say it has too many bells and whistles that might feel overwhelming to a smaller organization.
Well suited: Financial reporting - It can handle complex, pixel perfect, muti-page reports with scheduled delivery to stakeholders (like sales report by region on quarterly periodicity) Operational dashboard across departments - It can combine multiple data sources (ERP, CRM, excels etc) with filters, and embedded AI insights Less appropriate: Live dashboards - As stated earlier as well, IBM Cognos Analytics doesn't suit well for live dashboards or event driven data. For ex: live web traffic data or IOT device data, etc Data science - Although IBM Cognos Analytics is great tool for data exploration but it should not be used as a substitute for Python or R, which has edge over advanced modelling and stats based workflows like predictive modelling or clustering
Microsoft BI has a lot of features and is a very powerful tool, especially if you have folks on your team that know how to utilize all of its capabilities. To truly unlock all that it can do, it does require people to have a deep understanding of its capabilities. That's where the software really shines. If you are looking for a simpler, more basic reporting tool, there are other programs available that do not require such a steep learning curve.
There have been a few instances of users being locked out of Ceridian due to recent upgrades. Not ideal when an employee wants to see their paystub and is suddenly have login issues.
Not the best for when an employee is transferred to another country as their employee number is locked to their SIN or SSN. And, we are required to create a new user record with a new employee number for the new country.
IBM Cognos Analytics enables customer data segmentation, which is essential for marketing, improving and streamlining purchasing behavior and preferences. This helps companies create more targeted and effective marketing campaigns.
Our clients Through data analysis, we can identify and observe trends in the behavior of other clients, allowing us to anticipate needs and adjust strategies to avoid consequences.
We are highly invested in Ceridian's Dayforce product. It give us the flexibility and scaling that our growing company needs. Its potential reaches beyond the basic HR functions to the decision making that our Management Team needs. Ceridian is always innovating the employee and employee experiences to offer cutting edge options.
For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
Microsoft BI is fundamental to our suite of BI applications. That being said, Northcraft Analytics is focused on delighting our customers, so if the underlying factors of our decision change, we would choose to re-write our BI applications on a different stack. Luckily, mathematics are the fundamental IP of our technology... and is portable across all BI platforms for the foreseeable future.
I think it's very usable for the employee. I don't think it is as easy for the HR/PR admins - especially if there is an issue. There are so many setup screens that need to be looked at to try to figure out why payroll isn't calculating properly, hours aren't feeding over correctly, or benefits are not calculating properly. For the most part, they can't do their own troubleshooting. The same is true for the managers. Our managers find it cumbersome to go into make any schedule changes after the schedules have been generated.
We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
The Microsoft BI tools have great usability for both developers and end users alike. For developers familiar with Visual Studio, there is little learning curve. For those not, the single Visual Studio IDE means not having to learn separate tools for each component. For end-users, the web interface for SSRS is simple to navigate with intuitive controls. For ad-hoc analysis, Excel can connect directly to SSAS and provide a pivot table like experience which is familiar to many users. For database development, there is beginning to be some confusion, as there are now three tool choices (VS, SSMS, Azure Data Studio) for developers. I would like to see Azure Data Studio become the superset of SSMS and eventually supplant it.
Dayforce's high availability ensures that our HR processes are supported around the clock, which is critical for a global organization like ours. The platform is cloud-based, offering reliable access from any location at any time, allowing our employees, managers, and HR teams to stay connected regardless of time zones or geographic locations. This level of availability ensures that payroll processing, employee self-service, and real-time data access continue uninterrupted, even during peak periods or unforeseen disruptions. The system’s robust infrastructure minimizes downtime, which is vital for operations that span multiple regions. Additionally, having a centralized platform that’s always available helps keep our teams aligned, ensures compliance, and facilitates timely decision-making across all our locations.
Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
We haven't noticed any slow-down due to the integration of Dayforce WFM with our Ceridian HPL products (HRIS and Payroll). The new HTML view of the timesheets don't load as quickly as the old Silverlight view - however, we have gotten used to the change.
Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) can drag at times. We created two report servers and placed them under an F5 load balancer. This configuration has worked well. We have seen sluggish performance at times due to the Windows Firewall.
Most of the time the support is great; it's not always super efficient but I always get the help I need. Occasionally it takes a lot longer than we had hoped or get conflicting responses. We had one ticket recently where we were told we would have to pay the service team to support us on the project and then another person called the next day with the solution to our query and was able to find a solution easily. Generally, though, the response is great and they either walk me though how to do something via a Zoom Meeting or they email step-by-step instructions on how to do it and say if I have questions we can set up a meeting to discuss further.
Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
MSBI natively has a site that allows you to vote on user enhancements and bug fixes. This allows the largest nagging issues to float to the top and the development team can prioritize accordingly. As mentioned earlier, the large community base of MSBI developers assist technical resources in handling technical questions.
Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
The courses are very interactive and informative. There are classes for every topic, which allows you to make the most of the system. There are also some "go at your own pace" course which is a great option for a busy schedule.
The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
I have used on-line training from Microsoft and from Pragmatic Works. I would recommend Pragmatic Works as the best way to get up to speed quickly, and then use the Microsoft on-line training to deep dive into specific features that you need to get depth with.
Have a strong internal team. Communicate with your implementation team - they are there to make it work for you. Take the time to really think about how you want the system to work for you - in some cases, you may need to rethink your own business practices to see if you are working harder when the system could do it for you
Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
We are a consulting firm and as such our best resources are always billing on client projects. Our internal implementation has weaknesses, but that's true for any company like ours. My rating is based on the product's ease of implementation.
I can't speak much to how it would be if we had all of these features separately since I started with Dayforce all being integrated and have no other experience, but having it all in one place has made the completion of all of these HR tasks seamless. We can direct all of our energies into the same system, and it makes it easier to field employee inquiries and to troubleshoot when we need to
Power BI is stronger for quick ad-hoc analysis and dashboards, but IBM Cognos Analytics is better when consistency, precision, and mass distribution matter. Tableau is best for interactive analysis, while IBM Cognos Analytics is better for standardized, repeatable enterprise reporting. Sigma shines for customizable dashboards and drill-down analysis while IBM Cognos Analytics holds an edge in data discovery and visualization.
We have used the built in ConnectWise Manager reports and custom reports. The reports provide static data. PowerBI shows us live data we can drill down into and easily adjust parameters. It's much more useful than a static PDF report.
Overall, we are extremely happy with the Dayforce WFM module. Our biggest pain point is concerning the twice annual software upgrades - which is the only reason I haven't rated them as a '10'. Because every customer is configured differently, the upgrades can sometimes have adverse effects on our current configured policies/rules. And although they roll-out the upgraded version in a test environment several weeks before go-live, not all testing is accurate in that environment. Some issues do not present themselves until you are working with live punches.
The Cognos architecture is well suited for scalability. However, the architecture must be designed with scalability in mind from day one of the implementation. We recently upgraded from 10.1 to 10.2.1 and took the opportunity to revamp our architecture. It is now poised for future growth and scalability.
Performance Reviews/Comp used to be handled via paper and tracking/reporting was a nightmare - having all of that in the system is so much more efficient and provides huge ROI
Our organization used to have big problems with hiring managers going rogue and hiring positions that aren't approved by Finance - we built an approval workflow in the system that triggers before any req is approved which has completely solved this problem
Dayforce Wallet has been a huge perk for our employees - it's heavily used and our crew love it
As a SaaS provider we see being able to provide self-service BI to our client users as a competitive advantage. In fact the MSSQL enabled BI is a contributing factor to many winning RFPs we have done for prospective client organisations.
However MSSQL BI requires extensive knowledge and skills to design and develop data warehouses & data models as a foundation to support business analysts and users to interrogate data effectively and efficiently. Often times we find having strong in-house MSSQL expertise is a bless.