EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The EDB Postgres Advanced Server is an advanced deployment of the PostgreSQL relational database with greater features and Oracle compatibility, from EnterpriseDB headquartered in Bedford, Massachusetts.N/A
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) is a transactional relational database, boasting fast, reliable online transaction processing (OLTP). SAP ASE is the company's transactional database within the SAP Business Technology Platform portfolio.N/A
Pricing
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Features
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Relational Databases
Comparison of Relational Databases features of Product A and Product B
EDB Postgres Advanced Server
-
Ratings
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
8.3
1 Ratings
5% above category average
ACID compliance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Database locking00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Disaster recovery00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Multiple datatypes00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Small Businesses
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
SAP IQ
SAP IQ
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
EDB Postgres Advanced ServerSAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE)
Likelihood to Recommend
EnterpriseDB
It's great if you are using or wish to use PostgreSQL and need the added performance optimization, security features and developer and DBA tools. If you need compatibility with Oracle it's a must-have. There are many developer features that greatly assist dev teams in integrating and implementing complex middleware. It's great for optimizing complex database queries as well as for scaling. I would recommend Postgres Plus Advanced Server for any software development team that is hitting the limit of what PostgreSQL is capable of and wants to improve performance, security, and gain extra developer tools.
Read full review
SAP
We use this for an inbuilt security management system, where it performs well in a scaled setup with a large volume of live data with high availability. Also, the performance is up to the mark for the large statement flow. From a DBA perspective, a lot of parameters need to be fine-tuned for the specific environment needs, which can cause overhead. Expertise is limited, and the learning curve is steep for the SAP ASE.
Read full review
Pros
EnterpriseDB
  • PPAS Oracle compatibility, especially the PL/SQL syntax, has made migrating database-tier code very simple. Most Oracle packages do not need to be changed at all and those that do are generally for simple reasons like a reserved word in PPAS that is allowed in Oracle.
  • PPAS xDB, the multi-master replication tool, is simple and - most important - does not break with network or other interruptions. We have been able to configure and forget, which our customers could never do with other multi-master tools.
  • Most people had no idea that PPAS and PostgreSQL have full CRUD support for JSON. They think you need a specialized product and/or that JSON is read-only. Every organization that I have worked with is evaluating adding JSON to their relational model.
Read full review
SAP
  • High availability and reliability.
  • High performance.
  • Monitoring of threshold based events.
  • Security at multiple levels.
  • Query plan optimization.
  • Lock management.
  • Access to HANA.
Read full review
Cons
EnterpriseDB
  • Documentation is excellent but spread out across many resources and can take a while to wade through—would benefit from having more intro level, getting started guides for various languages.
  • Ruby support is excellent but more Ruby examples and beginner-level documentation would be nice.
  • It is sometimes hard to find a community of users on StackOverflow so a larger community, and a dedicated forum with active members to answer questions and work through issues would be nice.
Read full review
SAP
  • A quick button for devs to switch instances into a dev mode (eliminating logs, and such).
  • Licensing is far too complicated. Simplify pricing.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
EnterpriseDB
No answers on this topic
SAP
Our licenses are perpetual. It is the support that we will be renewing. We will renew because we continue to use and receive value from the product.
Read full review
Usability
EnterpriseDB
No answers on this topic
SAP
Well-suited in the security domain, high performance, and low latency of the DBMS. In terms of the DBA perspective, a dedicated monitoring tool (Cockpit) helps a lot in terms of managing the database, which helps in identifying bottlenecks during performance issues. Also, it helps us to send custom alerts related to Database activities.
Read full review
Support Rating
EnterpriseDB
No answers on this topic
SAP
Incredibly responsive, saving us countless hours in troubleshooting.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
EnterpriseDB
PPAS proved better for our customer's data-centric apps than Oracle in all but a few edge cases (encryption at rest and multi-TB database-tier backups) because it is simpler to install/maintain, runs nearly all Oracle-syntax SQL as well as ANSI SQL. PPAS has much more JSON capabilities (full CRUD vs. read-only in Oracle), simpler geospatial, simpler / more stable replication and datatypes that match developer expectations, such as BOOLEAN and ENUMs.
Read full review
SAP
Read full review
Return on Investment
EnterpriseDB
  • Postgres Plus Advanced Server is quite complex and may take longer to implement certain things than simply using PostgreSQL depending on developer familiarity with the platform.
  • Getting up to speed can be daunting so again, there is an upfront cost in time spent learning the platform, besides the potential for extra time spent on a feature-by-feature basis.
  • The cost of Postgres Plus Advanced Server should be weighed against simply using PostgreSQL to decide which is the best solution for your business needs.
Read full review
SAP
  • Positive ROI.
  • Ease of use with minimal training required to write high performance SQL (assumes a knowledge of SQL already).
  • Ease of database administration.
  • Sometimes upgrades can be difficult.
  • Changing platforms can be difficult (changing say from SPARC to Intel).
  • Changing operating systems can be difficult (changing from Solaris to linux).
Read full review
ScreenShots