The classic version of Google Hangouts included messaging, voice, VoIP, and video call capabilities. It was replaced by the Hangouts Chat collaboration tool, and Google continues to support conferencing via the new Hangouts Meet.
N/A
Webex Meetings
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Webex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.
Best part of Google Hangouts is its simplicity, and performance. We never had connection problems, or quality interruptions, something that is more frequent with the other tools listed above.
Again, Google Hangouts would primarily be used if you're already in the Google system. Corporate chat systems are far superior in functionality and usability and are also more reliable for larger organizations. For any company that is working with clients, I'd recommend a more …
The cost-benefit ratio has no point of comparison between one and another. At the time of evaluation, Skype (free account) of course was very limited compared to almost any other service paid account, and Skype for Business was too expensive for the benefits and/or tools it …
The listings I could find in the database aren't exact competitors. I would think of Google Meet, GoTo Meeting, or Zoom Video Conferencing as closer competitors. Hangouts has instant messaging feature like Jabber but really they aren't competing in the same lane. I think …
The closest alternative to Hangouts is Skype. Hangouts is a lot more practical since it allows easier teleconference setup, and is so much easier to use since it's web based and needs no installation. At work, we use HipChat as well since it's well integrated with Jira, but I …
Our current infrastructure uses Cisco Jabber for VOIP and its integration with WebEx was much stronger than Google Hangouts. But WebEx is primarily used by employees while students and faculty use Google Hangouts due to cost considerations. Also, since we have a significant …
WebEx Meetings is a platform packed with features, some that Google Hangouts and other smaller/simpler platforms do not have. Hangouts for example is used more for casual day-to-day quick meetings or discussions within the team, likely with 4 people or less (usually 1:1). WebEx …
Webex Meetings has become the standard
for Business solutions. All others are lower in their solution offering.
Cisco is improving Webex Meetings day by day. It is the best solution for video,
Google meets is too simple & lacks functionalities for group calls. Zoom sometimes become too overwhelming. WebEx sits perfectly in between them & provides useful features & a great mix of functionalities.
WebEx is simplistic for team meets & have vast list of tools for group …
Webex definitely stacks up against the competition with a little bit of a faster interface and a bit more of a nicer Meeting style and meeting window. Webex is also universally accepted especially with big banks So you have less to worry about when it comes to knowing if they …
Webex is simple to use but that does not mean it is a simple platform, it has several options to make sure we get our message to where it needs to get, and how it needs to be listened to/watched, with a few clicks we can set an appointment for a meeting.
As previously mentioned, Webex had no unique offering amongst its peers. Because there are options for licensing that don't involve VOIP, it was always limping along for us because of the time-waste looking for dial in information. There is no condition where VOIP should ever …
Zoom is basically the same thing as Webex (non-intuitive VoIP conferencing/screen sharing capabilities). Google and Microsoft's similar options were lacking features such as sharing desktops or sharing applications. Hangouts and Skype were the most intuitive for users for …
WebEx is great if access from multiple devices is required. Other platforms are great for specific, individual functions (like just face to face meetings, just audio, or just a presentation or slideshow). WebEx allows for functions like conference calls, screen sharing, sharing …
It's much more organized than say, Google Hangouts for business and allows us to roll out the software to the rest of our line of business. Since everyone utilizes WebEx in house, it's much more effective and less downtime.
Google is a little easier to schedule on the fly. WebEx has to be set up (the way our company uses it) and we don't necessarily have our own codes that we can use in a hurry. But I do like WebEx.
Webex has become the standard for Business. All others are following in Cisco's lead to compete. Cisco has improved Webex and is actually a great solution for Video, Voice, and Content. Webex is simply just Fast, Easy, and Secure to host your Meetings.
Webex Meetings is Cisco’s web and video conferencing solution and is ideal for business use cases. Google Hangouts Classic provides users with online communication capabilities like video conferencing and VoIP calling. However, though the classic version of Google Hangouts still exists and is free to use, it has evolved into two newer products that are better suited for business use cases: Google Chat and Google Meet. Google Hangouts Classic is better suited for personal use and for making one-off business calls.
Features
Both Cisco Webex Meetings and Google Hangouts Classic allow users to make video calls, voice calls, and send chats to other users. However, Webex Meetings has more advanced features that make it better-suited for business users than Google Hangouts Classic. On the other hand, Google’s product is free with lightweight features, making it preferable for personal use.
Cisco Webex Meetings includes features like screen sharing, meeting recording and transcription, both one-on-one and group chats, dial-in options for video meetings, and visibility into the list of meeting participants. In contrast, Google Hangouts Classic allows screen sharing and messages to other contacts but does not offer meeting recording or dial-in options for video meetings.
Google Hangouts Classic also only allows up to 25 meeting participants, while Webex Meetings can support online meetings with up to 100,000 participants. Users can launch Webex Meetings from within the Webex Application, Salesforce, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Canvas, and Moodle—whereas Google Hangouts Classic users can start meetings from the Google Hangouts web or mobile applications, Gmail, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Outlook.
Limitations
The main limitations of Cisco Webex Meetings are the feature restrictions on lower-tier plans, such as a meeting participant cap of 100 and meeting duration limit of 50 minutes on the free plan. Meeting recordings and transcriptions are also not available on the Cisco Webex Meetings free plan. However, they are available for all other paid plans.
If you’re planning on using Google Hangouts Classic for your business, there are a few key limitations to be aware of. For example, you won’t be able to record video meetings or meet with more than 25 participants at once. This may be fine for micro-businesses and small teams, however, this will be problematic for teams with more than 25 members. Google Meet is a better option than Hangouts Classic for midsize teams and larger businesses looking for a video conferencing platform.
Pricing
Cisco Webex Meetings offers a free plan with limited features and then four additional paid plans. The free plan only allows one meeting host, while the paid plans offer between 1-9, 1-50, 5-100, or an unlimited number of meeting hosts. Paid plan users also have access to more advanced features like encrypted cloud meeting recordings, meeting transcriptions, toll-dial in and toll-free dial-in options, and at least 5GB of cloud recording storage space.
Google Hangouts Classic is free for all users that have a Google account. However, Google is in the process of transitioning users away from Google Hangouts Classic to either Google Chat or Google Meetings, it’s two newer products ideal for business users. More information about the transition away from Google Hangouts Classic can be found here.
Features
Google Hangouts (Classic)
Webex Meetings
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
6.3
57 Ratings
24% below category average
Webex Meetings
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX
6.915 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
7.725 Ratings
00 Ratings
User templates
5.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call reports
9.034 Ratings
00 Ratings
Directory of employee names
3.045 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
8.0
66 Ratings
4% below category average
Webex Meetings
-
Ratings
Answering rules
8.033 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call recording
7.937 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call park
7.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call screening
9.036 Ratings
00 Ratings
Message alerts
8.058 Ratings
00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
8.6
84 Ratings
7% above category average
Webex Meetings
-
Ratings
Video conferencing
9.079 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio conferencing
9.079 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video screen sharing
7.148 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instant messaging
9.052 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
8.0
85 Ratings
1% below category average
Webex Meetings
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS
8.173 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android
8.071 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.6
839 Ratings
8% above category average
High quality audio
00 Ratings
9.0833 Ratings
High quality video
00 Ratings
9.0825 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
00 Ratings
7.9794 Ratings
Mobile support
00 Ratings
8.5757 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.5
825 Ratings
7% above category average
Desktop sharing
00 Ratings
8.7823 Ratings
Whiteboards
00 Ratings
8.2717 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.6
833 Ratings
5% above category average
Calendar integration
00 Ratings
8.6790 Ratings
Meeting initiation
00 Ratings
8.5819 Ratings
Integrates with social media
00 Ratings
8.3346 Ratings
Record meetings / events
00 Ratings
8.9777 Ratings
Slideshows
00 Ratings
8.6703 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Google Hangouts (Classic)
-
Ratings
Webex Meetings
8.7
788 Ratings
8% above category average
Live chat
00 Ratings
8.8766 Ratings
Audience polling
00 Ratings
8.9678 Ratings
Q&A
00 Ratings
8.5687 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Had I completed this review a couple years ago, I would have given a rating of 9 or 10 as Hangouts (Classic) is an excellent product. However, now that Google Chat has succeeded Hangouts, I would not recommend that any new users begin using it where other more modern options are available. Android users who want an internet based instant messaging that also supports calling and video calling could benefit from using Hangouts (Classic) as Google Chat requires the user to also have Google Meet installed to make video calls and there is no voice only calling option.
The first reason is the ease of use and availability, which makes WebEx work for all. The quality of audio and video is adorable. As a business development associate, I must make an impression on the other side, and WebEx helps me make first impressions. A few features are complex for new users but can be resolved.
I would like to see improved video support, so that saved videos can be sent back and forth via Hangouts more easily, without having to start a separate meet chat
More pronounced notifications of messages would be helpful; pop up notifications are good, but once there is one, additional messages do not pop up
Custom muting times would be great, so that if I am in a 90 minute Zoom meeting, I can set it for that time; right now, it is 1 hour or 2 hours. Easy to forget.
Only a few options are there for non-verbal feedback like hand raising or emoji reactions. They should work on it as expressing understanding or agreement would help collaborate with the cross-functional teams.
More options for creating custom workflows and integrations with internal tools would be helpful and the whiteboard also looks basic compared to other similar tools. I think, adding features like sticky notes and freehand drawing would be a great boost.
The mobile app is functional but I find it less intuitive and feature-rich compared to the desktop version. Should have parity in features and a more user-friendly interface will become more helpful for mobile users like me who sometimes conduct or attend meetings on the go.
Because Webex Meetings is known for its consistent performance, with high quality audio and video that works well even in low bandwidth situations. This makes it a dependable tool for both small and large meetings without worrying about technical glitches. Also, the platform is easy to navigate, both for meeting hosts and participants. Features like screen sharing, chat, and breakout rooms are intuitive
The tool is almost self-implemented. It is likely to be available in every pc or mobile device a user or potential user might have, and all you need to do is adding the company's account and you are done. Once you are setted up, you have almost all actual communication methods available in one tool
Webex Meetings does not provide enough audio feedback for users with visual disabilities to properly navigate the tool. Students, faculty, and staff who are blind or have low vision may not be able to use Webex Meetings. Users with motor disabilities that navigate via keyboard, may not be able to navigate the web conferencing session enough to participate fully.
So personally I have never faced any kind of meeting unavailability issue while scandaling meeting with WebEx the bandwidth is really good and in terms of application performance the same is my opinion what I mentioned for availability it is good and the objective of communication is quite fruitfully achieved with a simple and effective product like WebEx which is often bundled with the purchase of course which is which we have at our company and great discount is being offered so it is easy on our pocket. I really don't have any specific errors which have faced I should mention over here the operation or application uses is quite smooth.
We use browsers to join Webex Meetings and it is very good no issue also appears from Webex APP is very organized and does not consume more resources of PC so no issues appeared. We join audio and video in many ways, all of which are good. We integrated it with active Microsoft Exchange with easy deployment.
Google Hangouts works great and does not require a lot of work to troubleshoot. Everything is simple and easy to use. Google provides all of the tools that one requires to utilize Google Hangouts and any information can be found in the built-in help tools. There is also a forum for users to report issues and typically, Google responds well and will try to work out any issues.
The support cases can be opened instantly. The support engineers can support you via Telephone, E-Mail, WebEx Meetings, and My favorite WebEx application.24X7 Availability of the engineers. Step-by-step guidance is available by an engineer. https://help.webex.com/ - Great Site for instant FAQ's. https://status.webex.com/ - Is helpful to identify the updated schedule of WebEx or to know the server status of WebEx services.
It was straight to the point and very informative. effective training often includes clear explanations, hands-on practice opportunities, time for questions and answers, real-world examples, and follow-up support. If you're trying to assess the quality of a specific training session, you might consider these factors. For organizations looking to assess the quality of their in-person training, it's best to solicit feedback directly from the participants. This can be done through anonymous surveys or feedback sessions, enabling the organization to gather firsthand information and improve future training sessions accordingly.
It was very interactive and well explained. The trainor is very much knowledgeable of the product. He was able to answer all of our inquiries in a timely and professional manner. There were lots of exercises done during the duration of the training to ensure that we have a better view on what to expect from the product.
That we needed complex implementation that we didn't get tells me 2 things: 1) the product was not designed in a way that "just worked" like some of its peers (Zoom / BlueJeans) and 2) had our company defined actual user needs and validated / verified that they had bought something that matched those, we would have pursued features / designs more closely aligned with what the product actually does: screen share, sometimes video, definitely VOIP audio (always an option regardless of license), and easy recording and retrieval of meetings.
Google is the white cotton socks of the conferencing world. It’s a great ad-hoc tool, but not too much more. If you are not looking to spend money or operate completely on WiFi (without data charges), it’s a great free option as well. The benefit of being free and open is also the liability. It doesn’t have a great integration story with other corporate tools, but [it doesn’t have to] if you aren’t looking for that. All in all, it’s as helpful and ubiquitous as a public payphone…without the pay…and with a video capability.
The ability to transfer multimedia files directly into the platform and a very robust free plan helped me make the decision to try out Webex Meetings. Easy to set up in a company environment and accessible once the learning curve and sign up process are complete. In-platform web navigating is also a nice feature when onboarding new staff or doing market research.
I work for a Fortune 500 company with many employees so I can testify to its usability for large corporations. In addition, I use the software within my small team of sales reps so it is always usable on a small scale as well. In my eyes, this tool is scalable for businesses of all sizes without any hiccups or issues.
I believe it was part of the google suite that was purchased. It was worth the cost as it was cheaper. I believe it is now free, but also becoming deprecated. It is much better to use Teams, Discord, Telegram, etc. Google does not provide enough support or features to make using hangouts worth it these days.
The costly nature of individual accounts across multiple schools made it difficult to maintain the budget when our student population grew exponentially.
Often communicated to clients and stakeholders that we were a trustworthy and elevated provider.
Limited engagement and interactive features with students often contributed to complaints around student engagement and buy-in.