HiringThing vs. Rchilli

Hiring Thing is great for new organizations just starting out with smaller talent teams. It is very simple to use, add users, walkthrough processes, communicate with candidates, and walk through the hiring process. It does not work as well when an organization grows, needs lots of open requisitions, and has a decentralized hiring process.

Incentivized

This is a great tool if you need to imbed the functionality (as we have done). Perhaps not a well suited to standalone use.

• System navigation
• Posting to website and job boards
• Reviewing applicants quickly

Incentivized

• Parsing of Candidate Resumes with good accuracy
• Around 70 to 80 different Candidate Fields
• Supports Individual, Bulk Online and Offline Parsing

• The support side leaves room for improvement
• The offer letter and onboarding documents often didn't send
• Limited availability for posting

Incentivized

• So far, we have nothing to complain about.

We recently evaluated Azure Cognitive AI Services. It was not economical and we were asked to partner with another partner of Microsoft for specific Resume Parsing Services. Looking at the cost benefits, efficiency of parsing and ease of use of RChilli, we decided to continue with our very good partner RChilli

• We hired lots of people
• Lots of staff used the system
• It served as a bandaid

Incentivized

• Using Rchilli saved us thousands of dollars in development costs and avoided on-going maintenance.
• Using their taxonomy's means we don't have to maintain our own, saving us time and subscription costs.