Kubecost vs. ManageEngine CloudSpend

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kubecost
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Founded by ex-Google cloud engineers and PMs, Stackwatch headquartered in San Francisco, aims to enable teams to operate Kubernetes and cloud native infrastructure at scale. Their flagship product Kubecost is presented as tooling and intelligence to manage cost, performance, reliability and other infrastructure operability challenges.
$449
per month
ManageEngine CloudSpend
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine CloudSpend is a cost management solution for public clouds aiming to provide advanced analytics for IT and enable businesses to visualize runaway expenditure and implement budget controls in clouds. Being a SaaS-based cloud cost management software, CloudSpend helps provide precise insights into the cloud cost accrued, manage and optimize spending, and take data-driven cloud decisions.
$0
AWS bill
Pricing
KubecostManageEngine CloudSpend
Editions & Modules
Business
$449
per month 100 nodes
Enterprise
Custom Quote
Up to $3,000/month
$0.00
AWS bill
Above $100,000/month
0.5%
AWS bill (billed monthly)
$3,000 to $100,000/month
0.8%
AWS bill (billed monthly)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KubecostManageEngine CloudSpend
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
KubecostManageEngine CloudSpend
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.5 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KubecostManageEngine CloudSpend
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KubecostManageEngine CloudSpend
Likelihood to Recommend
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
No answers on this topic
Pros
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Show namespace level cost and usage
  • Allow rightisizibg At namespace level
  • Show effectiveness of current resources allocation
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
No answers on this topic
Cons
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Agents installation and the ping fed integration
  • The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency
  • Save on cloud investment
Read full review
ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

ManageEngine CloudSpend Screenshots

Screenshot of Cloudspend main dashboardScreenshot of Cloudspend budget viewScreenshot of Cloudspend tags profileScreenshot of Cloudspend Accounts splitupScreenshot of Cloudspend Budget view