TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise vs. Wolfram Mathematica

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016. Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.N/A

    Mathematica

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AWolfram's flagship product Mathematica is a modern technical computing application featuring a flexible symbolic coding language and a wide array of graphing and data visualization capabilities.

    $1,520

    per year

    Pricing
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseMathematica
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Standard Cloud
    $1,520
    per year
    Standard Desktop
    $3,040
    one-time fee
    Standard Desktop & Cloud
    $3,344
    one-time fee
    Mathematica Enterprise Edition
    $8,150.00
    one-time fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseMathematica
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Discounts available for students and educational institutions. The Network Edition reduce per-user license costs through shared deployment across any number of machines on a local-area network.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseMathematica
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    5.3
    3 Ratings
    45% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    MDM Integration3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Visualization7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    52% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment5.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations5.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Encryption3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Built-in Processors6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    6.0
    3 Ratings
    34% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools5.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    6.5
    2 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Wolfram Mathematica
    -
    Ratings
    Flexible Model Publishing Options6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    6 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.84 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.96 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    23% above category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.3
    8 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise and Wolfram Mathematica
    Feature
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Wolfram Mathematica
    9.9
    9 Ratings
    24% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings9.99 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings9.98 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseMathematica
    Small Businesses
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    Kibana
    Score8.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.9
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R EnterpriseMathematica
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We are the judgement that Wolfram Mathematica is despite many critics based on the paradigms selected a mark in the fields of the markets for computations of all kind. Wolfram Mathematica is even a choice in fields where other bolide systems reign most of the market. Wolfram Mathematica offers rich flexibility and internally standardizes the right methodologies for his user community. Wolfram Mathematica is not cheap and in need of a hard an long learner journey. That makes it weak in comparison with of-the-shelf-solution packages or even other programming languages. But for systematization of methods Wolfram Mathematica is far in front of almost all the other. Scientist and interested people are able to develop themself further and Wolfram Matheamatica users are a human variant for themself. The reach out for modern mathematics based science is deep and a unique unified framework makes the whole field of mathematics accessable comparable to the brain of Albert Einstein. The paradigms incorporated are the most efficients and consist in assembly on the market. The mathematics is covering and fullfills not just education requirements but the demands and needs of experts.
    Mathematica is incompatible with other systems for mCAx and therefore the borders between the systems are hard to overcome. Wolfram Mathematica should be consider one of the more open systems because other code can be imported and run but on the export side it is rathe incompatible by design purposes. A better standard for all that might solve the crisis but there is none in sight. Selection of knowledge of what works will be in the future even more focussed and general system might be one the lossy side. Knowledge of esthetics of what will be in the highest demand in necessary and Wolfram is not a leader in this field of science. Mathematics leves from gathering problems from application fields and less from the glory of itself and the formalization of this.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • It allows distributed algorithm runs on Hadoop HDFS cluster
    • It allows using different file formats such as SAS7BAT files or complex files in tab or comma delimited making data munging easier
    • It provides scalable solutions by allowing users to re-use R scripts and distributing the computing over nodes through RHadoop
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • It allows straightforward integration of analytic analysis of algebraic expressions and their numerical implemented.
    • Supports varying programmatic paradigms, so one can choose what best fits the problem or task: pure functions, procedural programming, list processing, and even (with a bit of setup) object-oriented programming.
    • The extensive and rich tools for graphical rendering make it very easy to not just get 2D and 3D renderings of final output, but also to do quick-and-dirty 2D and 3D rendering of intermediate results and/or debugging results.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Very steep learning curve... for such a quick and useful tool the learning curve is unacceptable.
    • Very dangerous in the wrong hands. Because most add-ons are pre-written, you have to trust the community that malicious script is not used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Should include more libraries and functions.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Machine Learning.
    • Should include more functions that can be used in Data Science.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Microsoft
    It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    Wolfram Mathematica is a nice software package. It has very nice features and easy to install and use in your machine. Besides this, there is a nice support from Wolfram. They come to the university frequently to give seminars in Mathematica. I think this is the best thing they are doing. That is very helpful for graduate and undergraduate students who are using Mathematica in their research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    We have evaluated and are using in some cases the Python language in concert with the Jupyter notebook interface. For UI, we using libraries like React to create visually stunning visualizations of such models. Mathematica compares favorably to this alternative in terms of speed of development. Mathematica compares unfavorably to this alternative in terms of license costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Helped save company money versus buying other stat software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolfram
    • Easy to solve huge mathematical equations, so it saved time there
    • Doing analysis and plotting graphs is also another plus point
    • Learning is very slow, and it took lot of time to learn its scripting language
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots