Netskope Private Access vs. Wandera

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Netskope Private Access
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Wandera
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Wandera in San Francisco provides a mobile security solution for enterprises with their multi-level solution to protect users, endpoints, and corporate applications from evolving mobile threats.N/A
Pricing
Netskope Private AccessWandera
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netskope Private AccessWandera
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
Netskope Private AccessWandera
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
10.0
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Wandera
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
9.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Wandera
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
9.4
1 Ratings
13% above category average
Wandera
-
Ratings
Network Analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Netskope Private Access
8.6
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Wandera
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Flow Control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Netskope Private AccessWandera
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Netskope Private AccessWandera
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Netskope Private AccessWandera
Likelihood to Recommend
Netskope
Netskope Private Access provides only authenticated users to access the application and it only allows those users whose access has been provided. It provides fast and secure access to the application, whereas a VPN allows users to connect to the whole network once the VPN is connected. Sometimes due to some back-end changes at the stitcher or management plane user is not able to connect the application which leads to customer business.
Read full review
Wandera
No answers on this topic
Pros
Netskope
  • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
  • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
  • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
Read full review
Wandera
No answers on this topic
Cons
Netskope
  • Publisher upgrade should be pre intimidated.
  • NPA user interface can be more simplified.
  • Backend changes should be notified.
Read full review
Wandera
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Netskope
In comparison to Zscaler Private Access, Netskope Private Access provides more features and stability to the user environment. Netskope private access improves user experience in comparison to Zscaler Private Access. Cost-wise, Zscaler is cheaper than Netskope private access. Netskope Private Access works comparatively better than Zscaler Private Access in a hybrid environment.
Read full review
Wandera
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Netskope
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
Read full review
Wandera
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots