From GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.
$12
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Webex Meetings
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Webex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.
$14.50
per month per user
Pricing
GoTo Meeting
Webex Meetings
Editions & Modules
Professional
$12.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
Business
$16.00
Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
3,000 Participants
Webex Meet
$14.50
per month per user
Webex Suite: Meet + Call
$25
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GoTo Meeting
Webex Meetings
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Pricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
It is easy to use and works well for small meetings. Zoom has more features, but GoTo Meeting is simpler and cheaper. We chose it because it’s a good fit for our needs.
GoTo Meeting is very similar to DialPad. GoTo Meeting and Dialpad are both cloud-based communication but are very different from one another. Theres less guess work in how to use GoTo Meeting, whereas the Dialpad app took a while getting used to. While I have enjoyed both, …
GoTo Meeting is a simpler product and easier to use than teams however it is lacking is some of the features that teams has mainly integration with the rest for the office 365 suite.
Very basic and will require you to likely user other software. I think this is why people prefer to use teams because they can do so much in one place. It is way more than just conferencing.
GoTo Meeting is more cross-platform compatible as compared to most of the other alternatives, the interface is more User friendly as compared to most of the other alternatives, it is more affordable as compared to most of the other alternatives, the process of accessing it is …
GoTo Meeting is cheaper but in general, both systems are comparable. Webex is also intuitive and offers good audio and video quality as well as basic online meeting features like screen sharing, whiteboard etc. We used GoTo Meeting with some external companies who find Webex …
It was highly recommend and proven to have great quality and easy features for all age employees that I have. Also can be useful on the go and on your cellphone
GoTo Meeting is easier to use, with a focus on streamlined controls. The clean and less cluttered meeting environment makes it easier to get things done. The pricing of GoTo Meeting is more competitive than Zoom making it a better option for small businesses like mine. All in …
We find that Google Meet doesn't integrate well externally and you can't managed attendee lists, keep them private, manage follow ups with a record on Google Meet. It's a great service to use for meeting locally with internal collogues but just doesn't meet our needs as our …
At first, I never thought that this platform is existing because I have been exposed to different platform before, not until I was employed in my current company and I can say that it helps me to communicate with my colleague . If there's an urgent concern regarding the task, I …
GoTo Meeting is good for small organizations. For my personal use I prefer google meet but for professional use I like to use GoTo Meeting. It gives a good quality video and audio which is something that make you compare the product with other similar products. The free …
GoTo Meeting is substantially better. Much more reliable and easier for participants to join. We have never had a "zoombomb" with GoTo Meeting but we did with Zoom working with a prospective investor. It was hard to come back from what the client saw! Zoom is not an option for …
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop …
Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
Our CIO made the decision - all the products work well. He travels a lot and preferred the GoTo Meeting mobile app over the other applications' mobile capability. The cost basis was similar to both Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Our users had familiarity with GoTo Meeting which …
I also love that GoTo Meeting has a mobile app for working on the go. If your WiFi isn't working well, you can also dial in to listen to the meeting. Additionally, if you are not able to join at all, there is a recording feature to ensure you are not missing out.
Webex is the only product that allows us to integrate our existing infrastructure and collaboration solutions right out of the box. We use On-Prem Call Manager and Unity Connection for Voicemail. Everything integrates in Webex seamlessly. If we were to switch to one of the …
I'd say the adoption of the Microsoft Teams product really drove us away from Webex Meetings. I think just the ease of use of users using the Microsoft Suite and what teams initially went in for at our company, which was really just a chatting tool, and now it's turned into …
Webex Meetings had the immediate call functionality, where this functionality is lagging in GMeet and Zoom, where it stands on top among its competitors. Webex Meetings has good-quality audio and video. The screensharing option in Webex Meetings is also really good. The …
They all handle collaboration and meetings well and all offer various experiences. On the whole I wouldn't say any one of the products stand out against the other so it would have to come down to ease of integration, installation an costing. Webex Meetings holds its own well …
Webex Meetings is almost incomparable more so because of the integration options and its variety of features that makes teamwork, collaboration and communication smooth.
Overall, Webex does a pretty good job. Google meet ultimately ranks high because of how most schools utilize Google Apps to drive most of the digital learning environment and how teams integrates with a free LMS like Google Classroom. However, Zoom offers a lot of features and …
Webex compares well with GoToMeeting software. It has excellent options, the go-to meeting app. It works well with the quality of connected hardware controls, like audio and video services. The chat and recording services work better, making it stand out in the industry. Works …
Webex works best for my work against all the tools we use. Helps in communication as well as better collaboration with everyone. Especially meeting clients has been great via Webex Meetings. Project team uses it mostly and find effective at all times. Project managers use it to …
Webex interface is great and beats many other software available in the market. It has better audio and video controls and provides a great way to share screen. The team has not raised concerns using Webex and has been satisfied using it yet. I believe the Webex has helped us …
We still use a combination of a few collaboration softwares. Webex offers the most enterprise-grade tools compared to its competitors. Many of our top market clients recommend and insist on Webex primarily for security and privacy reasons. The experience has always been smooth …
I like them much better. I think Zoom caused us a lot of issues for people with time and people couldn't be their own manager. We just had a lot of problems with Zoom. That's what we primarily used before this. So it has caused us a lot of problems in the past. So WebEx is way …
We are using Webex Meetings from last few years. Webex emphasizes data security and offers a stable connection, which is crucial for enterprise communications. Webex offers a suite of tools including screen sharing, virtual backgrounds, breakout rooms, real-time captions, and …
Microsoft Teams has always given us issues if we run an extensive meeting with more than 30 participants. Often, HR would train many people at once, and call quality would degrade or crash. This provides a good alternative when Teams is not working correctly, but we must continue orientation or training. It is inappropriate for all meetings since we are embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, and Teams integrates well with SharePoint.
The first reason is the ease of use and availability, which makes WebEx work for all. The quality of audio and video is adorable. As a business development associate, I must make an impression on the other side, and WebEx helps me make first impressions. A few features are complex for new users but can be resolved.
We have a global and diverse team with different devices and operating systems. Webex works smoothly on all of them and everyone can collaborate in real-time saving a lot of time and effort, making meetings much more productive.
We can easily capture discussion points and decisions for future reference, without the need for manual note-taking. It helps us in smaller group discussions and brainstorming sessions within the main meeting itself.
I can even tailor the layout to suit the meeting's purpose and agenda. Webex is intuitive and easy to navigate, even for non-technical users, joining and scheduling meetings is a smooth process.
Lack of security updates (Not sure if they are taking care of but they should make users aware of it frequently)
Brand recognition improvement (Specifically in the US market where many customers still prefer Zoom)
Many prospects still consider GoTo as a legacy platform compared to Meet, Teams, Zoom. This is not a missing feature but GoTo team should really position themselves as innovative rather than pre-existing perceived notion of being legacy.
We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
Webex is going in a direction which is going to make it incompatible with how we use it. They're more interested in developing the gimmicky AI features and leaving behind the core ability to share documents and allow participants to annotate and save annotated shared documents and other features that were what made it the best choice for classrooms.
The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
Webex Meetings does not provide enough audio feedback for users with visual disabilities to properly navigate the tool. Students, faculty, and staff who are blind or have low vision may not be able to use Webex Meetings. Users with motor disabilities that navigate via keyboard, may not be able to navigate the web conferencing session enough to participate fully.
So personally I have never faced any kind of meeting unavailability issue while scandaling meeting with WebEx the bandwidth is really good and in terms of application performance the same is my opinion what I mentioned for availability it is good and the objective of communication is quite fruitfully achieved with a simple and effective product like WebEx which is often bundled with the purchase of course which is which we have at our company and great discount is being offered so it is easy on our pocket. I really don't have any specific errors which have faced I should mention over here the operation or application uses is quite smooth.
We use browsers to join Webex Meetings and it is very good no issue also appears from Webex APP is very organized and does not consume more resources of PC so no issues appeared. We join audio and video in many ways, all of which are good. We integrated it with active Microsoft Exchange with easy deployment.
When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
The support cases can be opened instantly. The support engineers can support you via Telephone, E-Mail, WebEx Meetings, and My favorite WebEx application.24X7 Availability of the engineers. Step-by-step guidance is available by an engineer. https://help.webex.com/ - Great Site for instant FAQ's. https://status.webex.com/ - Is helpful to identify the updated schedule of WebEx or to know the server status of WebEx services.
In-person training offers the benefit of personalized instruction. Users have the chance to ask specific questions and work through any challenges directly with an instructor. This hands-on learning style can be incredibly valuable for those who learn better through interaction. With in-person training, participants can receive instant feedback and troubleshooting assistance for any technical issues they encounter during the session. This makes it easier to resolve issues on the spot rather than waiting for online support.
It was very interactive and well explained. The trainor is very much knowledgeable of the product. He was able to answer all of our inquiries in a timely and professional manner. There were lots of exercises done during the duration of the training to ensure that we have a better view on what to expect from the product.
That we needed complex implementation that we didn't get tells me 2 things: 1) the product was not designed in a way that "just worked" like some of its peers (Zoom / BlueJeans) and 2) had our company defined actual user needs and validated / verified that they had bought something that matched those, we would have pursued features / designs more closely aligned with what the product actually does: screen share, sometimes video, definitely VOIP audio (always an option regardless of license), and easy recording and retrieval of meetings.
GoTo Meetings has no time limit for sessions with more than x attendees. GoTo Meetings provides an easy way to allow attendees to share their screens. GoTo Meeting does not require membership/license/registration attendees; they are not required to download the desktop application. They can attend from the web if they choose to do so.
The ability to transfer multimedia files directly into the platform and a very robust free plan helped me make the decision to try out Webex Meetings. Easy to set up in a company environment and accessible once the learning curve and sign up process are complete. In-platform web navigating is also a nice feature when onboarding new staff or doing market research.
I can speak to multiple departments at my organization using Webex Meetings. It has been, and continues to be, our longest online meeting software. It has been deployed across the organization and each department uses it. As I have mentioned, our monthly all-organization Town Halls are hosted on Webex. We have also used it to broadcast a panel-based speaker event.
Our clients and teams like the solution and have been using it for years.
Tiered pricing could improve the cost for SMBs, but the ROI is still great for what we use Webex for.
The install base using the product and its features saves us money in not using other solutions that are not as flexible, saving us money in annual license fees.
From a global meeting and conference perspective, no significant issues cause scheduling and participation problems.
We can grow usage of tool and not break the budget.
Team leadership finds it cost effective, but can be improved.