Overall Satisfaction with StarWind Virtual SAN
I use StarWind Virtual SAN to provide a cost-effective shared data volume for a simple two-node Windows cluster that provides services to the whole school community via Hyper-V roles. The software was selected on price and performance criteria - at the time of implementation the school did not have the budget for a hardware SAN and StarWind vSAN was a perfect fit for our use case.
- Great user Interface
- HIgh performance even on slow networks
- clear and helpful knowledge base articles
- Great command line support
- C# and VC++ APIs
- Post installation support call very useful
- Occasionally the documentation/knowledge base isn't explicit about the implications of particular configuration choices.
- unsynchronized volumes, it is a manual process to trawl event logs looking for information; as this information is available and the process to determine the last written copy of the data is deterministic/repeatable I would have thought a tool to search the available node event logs would be handy to have.
- It could be clearer that if you use the GUI (Trial license) AT ALL, you cannot then configure the system to use the Free Tier license.
- Enabled us to replace separate servers with a fail over HA cluster
- Provided a cost-effective alternative to a hardware-based SAN
- Provide timely configuration support
- Reduced reliance on aging hardware
Do you think StarWind Virtual SAN delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with StarWind Virtual SAN's feature set?
Yes
Did StarWind Virtual SAN live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of StarWind Virtual SAN go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy StarWind Virtual SAN again?
Yes