What users are saying about
22 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 100
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.8 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

    Workload Automation

    7.1

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation

    71%

    PhantomBuster

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    ActiveBatch Workload Automation ranks higher in 6/6 features

    Multi-platform scheduling

    5.9
    59%
    9 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Central monitoring

    6.8
    68%
    11 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Logging

    8.0
    80%
    10 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Alerts and notifications

    6.8
    68%
    11 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Analysis and visualization

    8.9
    89%
    10 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Application integration

    5.9
    59%
    10 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • PhantomBuster is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    6.8

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation

    68%
    11 Ratings
    9.0

    PhantomBuster

    90%
    1 Rating

    Usability

    8.1

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation

    81%
    3 Ratings

    PhantomBuster

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    4.0

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation

    40%
    2 Ratings

    PhantomBuster

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Redwood Software

    I can only speak for our environment, but it has allowed us to get away from the unfriendly Informatica PowerCenter workflow schedule. And coordination of Informatica/Tableau/ICEDQ has been a BIG help to us. We have not tried to drill down to the Informatica session-level of detail, just stayed with running workflows. The session-level logic seemed complicated.
    Read full review

    PhantomBuster

    It is very useful for data extraction from different sources and automation like Linkedin invitation My databases would not have the quality they have right now if I did not use Phantombuster It is not very useful for Mails Extractions, Phantombuster extraction tools does not give you goods mailing format
    Read full review

    Pros

    Redwood Software

    • File management - moving, archiving, and folder cleanup are a drag-and-drop breeze. The visual representation of file management steps includes date/time filtering, file/folder/both specification, and recursion all in an easy and intuitive unit.
    • FTP/SFTP/FTPS - while one must still write the FTP scripts, the interface simplifies much of the infrastructure, allowing the developer to encapsulate the script text in a graphical package that is easy and intuitive.
    • PowerShell integration - for anything that isn't easy in ActiveBatch's GUI, simply drop in a PowerShell step and write the task in PoSh - anything returned from PoSh can then be used by the following steps.
    Read full review

    PhantomBuster

    • Data Extraction
    • Automation
    • Integration with Google Sheets
    • A lot of features
    Read full review

    Cons

    Redwood Software

    • While I like being able to reuse scheduling objects and the like, more work needs to be done to help one not reinvent the same scheduling object without realizing it and to then find scheduling objects that have similar schedules even if they are worded slightly differently than what I'm expecting. It needs to be "smarter". It was easy to accumulate a pool of scheduling objects that while named differently, had exactly the same schedule. It was also hard to sift through to find the little differences between similarly named scheduling objects.
    • The logger had a clean enough interface but it could be more legible and offer contextual help to describe the messages one is reading. I remember trying to read black text on a medium gray background with Courier size 10-11 font. Not so easy to read quickly and to parse through the relevant parts. I think some selective color coding would be good and links to message definitions or any form of further information would be nice. Maybe the ability to export the log file to various formats would also be helpful.
    • I don't remember a dashboard that at a glance on the top level would highlight what jobs failed completely and which jobs might have warnings or non-critical errors. I got emails because I defined to get them. Maybe again if there was a way to color-code the type of error would be good nice-to-have.
    Read full review

    PhantomBuster

    • Mailing Extractor
    • Excel connection
    • Video tutorial of features
    Read full review

    Pricing Details

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      Optional

      Additional Details

      PhantomBuster

      Starting Price

      $30 per month

      Editions & Modules

      PhantomBuster editions and modules pricing
      EditionModules
      Growth Hacker$301
      Free Forever$02
      Business$703
      Enterprise$2004
      Premium$9005

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      Optional

      Additional Details

      8% discount available for annual pricing.

      Usability

      Redwood Software

      ActiveBatch's usability is where it shines. It is pretty straight-forward to learn and administer. Our engineers like it because you can use a GUI to manage it or leverage the command line & api's. You can also create templates or clone existing "jobs" so you don't have to recreate the wheel. It is easy to chain jobs together to make them run in a specific sequence as well.
      Read full review

      PhantomBuster

      No answers on this topic

      Support Rating

      Redwood Software

      We have been pretty happy with ActiveBatch support so far. Luckily, we have not had any major issues with it - so we haven't logged a lot of support tickets. The response time to tickets is about average and the level of expertise of the support engineers seems about average as well. Our sales team has been helpful in getting faster responses when necessary as well.
      Read full review

      PhantomBuster

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      Redwood Software

      We looked at several other workload automation solutions and hands down we all looked at each other after seeing the demo and we all understood the genius of the application. To be honest we were all stunned and talked about it for weeks afterward. It didn't even compare to the other platforms we had demos of. We knew instinctively that this was the one.
      Read full review

      PhantomBuster

      I don't really have the opportunity to test another Data Extraction tool like Phantombuster. When I started my job they already have bought this tool so I learned how to use it and honestly I do not have any need to change it. I think Phantombuster is the best for this
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Redwood Software

      • ActiveBatch [Workload Automation] has increased our nightly processing stability exponentially. Our prior automation software was unreliable and often failed without explanation. Since moving to ActiveBatch [Workload Automation] we have had incredible stability, and any nightly processing errors that happen now are attributed to a cause other than automation. It's the most reliable software we currently use at our company.
      Read full review

      PhantomBuster

      • More Leads
      • Better leads quality
      • Fast Communication
      Read full review

      Add comparison