Amazon SageMaker vs Databricks Unified Analytics Platform

• Provides enough freedom for experienced data scientists and also for those who just need things done without going much deeper into building models.
• Customization and easy to alter and change.
• If you already are an Amazon user, you do not need to transition over to another software.

Read full review

• Very simplified infrastructure initialization
• Seamless and automated optimization of job execution
• Simple tool to get used to

Read full review

• SageMaker does not allow you to schedule training jobs.
• SageMaker does not provide a mechanism for easily tracking metrics logged during training.
• We often fit feature extraction and model pipelines. We can inject the model artifacts into AWS-provided containers, but we cannot inject the feature extractors. We could provide our own container to SageMaker instead, but this is tantamount to serving the model ourselves.

Read full review

• Better Localized Testing
• When they were primarily OSS Spark; it was easier to test/manage releases versus the newer DB Runtime. Wish there was more configuration in Runtime less pick a version.
• Graphing Support went non-existent; when it was one of their compelling general engine.

Read full review

• We have been able to deliver data products more rapidly because we spend less time building data pipelines and model servers.
• We can prototype more rapidly because it is easy to configure notebooks to access AWS resources.
• For our use-cases, serving models is less expensive with SageMaker than bespoke servers.

Read full review

• Quick adoption of cloud services by end users
• Cost is high

Read full review