Appcast vs. Zedo

It has allowed me to streamline my job ad buying and selling process all in one dashboard.

Incentivized

The vendor needs to fit the client so the reason I worked with them was that they were not too big or too small for our organization. Also, they were more likely to adapt to our workflow which is great as some vendors in this space wanted us to conform to their processes, which was not wanted.

Incentivized

• Makes it easy to manage job feeds.
• Makes it easy to manage traffic acquisition from multiple publishers.
• Easy to use reporting dashboard for you and your customers.

Incentivized

• Campaign set up in our ad server at the time, 27/7 Real Media's OAS platform.
• Post-campaign reporting.
• Our main point of contact, I believe her name was Nafisa, was extremely friendly and became an extension of the team. She really was fun to work with and professional.

Incentivized

• Need to be more open to suggestions from clients.
• Need to get better customer service turnaround time.
• Need more knowledgeable staff.

Incentivized

• They had their own ad server and there were regular efforts to get us to move to that ad server which was not industry standard at the time. We already an agreement in place with OAS and also used DFP via agency access but they pushed to use this server and it was not something I really needed to keep discussing with them.

Incentivized

I worked with a company called Asentech whose core competence at the time was not campaign management. Zedo replaced them and did a great job. I have since evaluated Theorem, OAO and YourBow and Zedo offers as much if not more than those companies.

Incentivized

• Positive sales margins.
• Positive time allocation.

Incentivized

• At the beginning of the month, we had a crush of new campaigns to launch and they stepped up their game to get this accomplished. Also, reporting was done very quickly with a lot of insight into campaign optimization.

Incentivized