Bubble.io vs. Flutter by Google

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bubble
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Bubble (bubble.io) is a no code app development platform from the Bubble Group in New York.
$25
per month
Flutter
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Flutter is an open-source mobile application development framework created by Google. It is used to develop applications for Android and iOS, as well as being the primary method of creating applications for Google Fuchsia.
$0
Pricing
Bubble.ioFlutter by Google
Editions & Modules
Personal
$25
per month
Professional
$115
per month
Production
$475
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BubbleFlutter
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bubble.ioFlutter by Google
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Bubble.ioFlutter by Google
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Bubble.io
9.3
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Flutter by Google
-
Ratings
Platform Security9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
No-Code Development
Comparison of No-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Bubble.io
9.8
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Flutter by Google
-
Ratings
No Coding Required10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaborative App Development9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual Data Modeling10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Framework Integration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Deployment10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Managed Hosting10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Bubble.ioFlutter by Google
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.8 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
Swiftify
Swiftify
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bubble.ioFlutter by Google
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.9
(17 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bubble.ioFlutter by Google
Likelihood to Recommend
Bubble Group
I recommend using Bubble.io for most web applications, including SaaS platforms, marketplaces, e-commerce, social media platforms and much more. While Bubble.io does a lot well, it could do a better job at processing/creating data faster. So if you have a heavily intensive application where you need to create and pass around millions of rows of data in short amounts of time, it might be worth looking at other backend systems to use.
Read full review
Google
Flutter is well known for native app development, if you have android studio installed on your system, you can quickly start using it. This might not be the best choice for you if you do not wish to learn a new language, i.e. Dart and you do not know it already.
Read full review
Pros
Bubble Group
  • Performance
  • Ease of use
  • Scalability
Read full review
Google
  • User interface design works great across all platforms, including native styling for iOS/macOS.
  • Native compilation for mobile platforms and a decent rendering engine results in slick apps that can make the most of your device.
  • Dart is a well thought out language and easy to pick up.
  • Makes cross-platform development of good looking GUI apps a doddle.
Read full review
Cons
Bubble Group
  • Big learning curve
  • Not optimized for large development teams yet.
Read full review
Google
  • Occasionally updates to the Flutter SDK result in wide-sweeping changes that seem to not be thoroughly tested and considered. Flutter sometimes evolves too fast for its own good.
  • While the 3rd-party Flutter package ecosystem is vast and rich, 1st-party support for basic things (audio/video playback, battery information, Bluetooth services, etc.) are lacking. You are occasionally forced to rely on an open-source package for use-cases that other platforms have native support for.
  • Documentation, particularly around testing, is lacking. While there are some great docs, like the Dart Style Guide, many Flutter-focused support documents are lacking in quality and real-world usability.
  • Flutter allows you to architect an app however you want. While this is a great feature, it also adds complexity and leads to the current state of Flutter's state management, where there are 50+ options on how to organize your app, with very little official guidance or recommendations from the Flutter team. For a beginner, this can create decision paralysis.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bubble Group
Bubble.io is far superior! You can build anything that you want in Bubble.io, which makes it the best part!
Read full review
Google
I have experience with react and React Native. I would say that the idea behind all those frameworks are quite similar. However, I found the javascript-based frameworks a bit more accessible as you could utilise your javascript knowledge. Here, Flutter works with its own language. This has advantages and disadvantages sometimes. I found the community around javascript frameworks bigger and therefore sometimes more helpful. However, Flutter does a good job here as well. I think the main argument for Flutter is its usability for less experienced developers. If you do not have knowledge in javascript or other programming languages then I think it is much easier to start with Flutter than with another framework like react. I think the package that you get form scratch is better than in the other frameworks were you have to set up and learn a lot more before you can start.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bubble Group
  • Produce more technology, faster.
  • Produce more technology, cheaper.
  • Freed us up to focus more on the business side of things
Read full review
Google
  • The rapid development capabilities of Flutter allow us to build apps we could not have previously considered commercially viable, opening new revenue streams.
  • Free and open licensing made adoption very easy (ie. free/low cost!).
  • In comparison to Qt, our time spent arguing with build tools and perfecting development environments has decreased substantially.
Read full review
ScreenShots