Cisco Firepower 2100 Series vs. Cisco Firepower 4100 Series

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Cisco offers the Firepower 2100 Series NGFW, designed to allow businesses to gain resiliency through superior security with sustained performance. The Firepower 2100 Series has a dual multicore CPU architecture that optimizes firewall, cryptographic, and threat inspection functions simultaneously, to achieve security doesn’t come at the expense of network performance.N/A
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco Firepower 4100 Series’ 1-rack-unit size is presented by the vendodr as ideal at the Internet edge and in high-performance environments. They further state that it shows what’s happening on your network, detects attacks earlier so you can act faster, and reduces management complexity.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Editions & Modules
Firepower 2100
3,000-20,000
per appliance
Firepower 4100
50,000-250,000
per appliance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Considered Both Products
Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
Chose Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
In the days of purchase of Cisco Firepower 2100 series it was new platform and Cisco aimed their sailsmains to force selling this platfrom. It was one of the first platform with FXOS with full support of ASA images. It was cheper then 4k series and would be better than ASA …
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series

No answer on this topic

Features
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Firepower 2100 Series
8.5
2 Ratings
2% below category average
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
8.3
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Identification Technologies9.02 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Visualization Tools6.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Content Inspection9.02 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Policy-based Controls9.02 Ratings8.55 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP9.02 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Firewall Management Console8.02 Ratings8.55 Ratings
Reporting and Logging9.02 Ratings8.55 Ratings
VPN10.02 Ratings7.95 Ratings
High Availability10.02 Ratings9.45 Ratings
Stateful Inspection10.02 Ratings9.55 Ratings
Proxy Server5.02 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Likelihood to Recommend
5.5
(2 ratings)
8.5
(5 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Firepower 2100 SeriesCisco Firepower 4100 Series
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
The Cisco [Firepower] 2100 [Series] is an easy sell for anyone looking. You already know Cisco excels in the security department, but now that firepower lives right on the box and inline with the rest of the firewall data flow you can save yourself a lot of time and headaches. Unless you cant quite afford Cisco's 2100 line, there's not much reason to go with the competition.
Read full review
Cisco
When we are asked by local partners which security equipment we use we always recommend our Cisco security products. The Firepower firewall is no exception and we can easily recommend this to others who need a fast, secure, and well built system that integrates well with all your existing hardware and software.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Advanced threat protection
  • Secure VPN connectivity
  • Visibility and control (if connected to FMC)
  • Regulatory compliacnce with ISO 27001, NIS2, etc.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Packet filtering
  • Great vpn client
  • Integrates correctly with other vendors
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Career-wise very familiar with the ASAs, you know, the previous gen firewalls, Pyxis, ASAs, the CHA. As far as being intuitive, those seem to be far more intuitive to learn and figure out what the features and changes and config management, all that stuff is. With Firepower, it's a learning curve and I feel like I have quite a bit of experience with it, and so does my team, but feels like it's not as intuitive, and trying to make changes just always seems harder for some reason. We've gone to some Cisco security training and all that, but even then it's just harder to work with. The other big thing is, and this is a big gripe of mine, I suppose, that on any other firewall, when we have various different manufacturers, if you make a change, you know, a simple change object, object name gets changed or object is deleted or whatever the simplest of change is, it gets implemented instantly.
  • With the Firepower system, you have to deploy the change and it'll take about six or seven minutes for the change to actually take, which is insanely different than any other platform where that change is instantaneous. So let's say if I'm making seven different changes for a troubleshooting job I don't know which one of the seven is gonna fix it, I do one by one by one. I'm like, oh, let me try one change, one second, change, third change, four changes. It's going to take seven deploys. And seven deploys mean it's gonna take an hour of just deploy time. So that is a big, big gripe
Read full review
Cisco
  • Too much time to deploy changes
  • When there are a lot of entries in the ldap mapping the device runs slow
  • You can not make config changes via CLI, only via GUI
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
There are three main problems with this platform: - short EoL time - it is really missery because this platform was overrated from cisco sales and after shor time they accepted on EoL - sometimes problems with upgrades paths, because of strange behaviour between FXOS and ASA image on the top of it - not good performance when comparing to newer 1k platform
Read full review
Cisco
It not easy to understand the different features it offers. Sometimes you need to spend a couple of minutes to implement a change or even open a ticket with cisco tac to figure it out. Once support is on the phone with you they know how to resolve problems. But it's not an intuitive tool
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
In the days of purchase of Cisco Firepower 2100 series it was new platform and Cisco aimed their sailsmains to force selling this platfrom. It was one of the first platform with FXOS with full support of ASA images. It was cheper then 4k series and would be better than ASA 5500-x series (but regarding all problems with upgrades and EoL , it is not).
Read full review
Cisco
As I mentioned before, the Fortigates have better failover. I think the Cisco interface is easier to use that that of the FortiGate. My only criticism would be that with multiple CLIs, it can get a bit confusing when you are trying to configure something or troubleshoot from the CLI.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Simplifying our lives by reducing our time spent in a console
  • Being comfortable knowing the full might of Cisco is safeguarding your network
  • A good excuse to bump up the IT budget in the next fiscal year!
Read full review
Cisco
  • Very stable and does not cause major interruption.
  • Supports most of the business requirements.
  • Enhance security, risk and compliance.
Read full review
ScreenShots