What users are saying about
11 Ratings
4 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100
11 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 10 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Tririga is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

8.5

CloudApper Facilities

85%
3 Ratings
10.0

Tririga

100%
3 Ratings

Usability

CloudApper Facilities

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0

Tririga

80%
1 Rating

Availability

CloudApper Facilities

N/A
0 Ratings
10.0

Tririga

100%
2 Ratings

Performance

CloudApper Facilities

N/A
0 Ratings
9.0

Tririga

90%
2 Ratings

Support Rating

CloudApper Facilities

N/A
0 Ratings
7.0

Tririga

70%
2 Ratings

Implementation Rating

CloudApper Facilities

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0

Tririga

80%
2 Ratings

Product Scalability

CloudApper Facilities

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0

Tririga

80%
1 Rating

Likelihood to Recommend

CloudApper

Being a facilities management app, it is best utilized in a facility that needs to maintain a lot of assets. This can be regular offices, factories and warehouses. Field-based teams will not benefit from this app, nor will remote employees. Overall, the app is quite good at doing what it says, and providing notifications.
Read full review

IBM

It is great for organizations who have complex data or large amounts of data. For an organization that has small amounts of data or very simple processes TRIRIGA might be too much. It can handle small data and processes but the costs of implementing and supporting might be greater than the reward that would be provided. It also has a lot of room to grow. You can utilize existing forms and business objects or you can custom build new ones to fit business needs.
Read full review

Pros

CloudApper

  • Overall experience of using this software is highly satisfactory
  • Helpful in tracking and viewing the location on assets
  • Easy work order management
  • The report module is very powerful; you can generate very insightful reports with it
Read full review

IBM

  • Diverse categories of requests available
  • Ability to be as descriptive as possible without character limit
  • Ease of mass resource assignment for tasks
  • Ease of mass maintenance task/request printing work orders
  • Clean site layout that is easy to navigate
Read full review

Cons

CloudApper

  • UI
  • UX
  • Tutorials
Read full review

IBM

  • In order to get into the back end and manage spaces, there are too many "clicks" and pop up boxes to get to the area that is needed, which causes delays and confusions.
  • It can be a bit slow when processing requests, pulling up maps.
  • Trigia holds a lot of information, which is good but it could be easier to get to at times.
Read full review

Pricing Details

CloudApper Facilities

Starting Price

$0

Editions & Modules

CloudApper Facilities editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Tririga

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    Tririga editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Usability

      CloudApper

      No answers on this topic

      IBM

      I give it this rating because it has more than one way to get to most forms but it can be hard to navigate if you don't know the terms TRIRIGA uses. Also being a new developer can bring up issues with not knowing exactly where certain things are found. The documentation doesn't help too much sometimes since the TRIRIGA community is pretty small.
      Read full review

      Reliability and Availability

      CloudApper

      No answers on this topic

      IBM

      In the almost 7 months I have been working on my current project there has been exactly one unplanned outage. This was in the QA environment during data migration and was caused by a workflow that was circular and self referencing which caused the processing JAVA memory to spike, not resolve and then crash the server.
      Read full review

      Performance

      CloudApper

      No answers on this topic

      IBM

      TRIRIGA does a good job of this, being a server based web application it is like other web based systems so it's not as fast as a client server application or a local system but it is very consistent across locations and for different roles and employees. This does allow consistent use no matter where people are located. It also does a fair job of notifying the user when it is loading with the spinning circle or hour glass. The reports can get fairly complex but native TRIRIGA reports perform well even when they are complex. They can be a little slow if they are fetching 100's of 1000's of rows but this doesn't take more than 10 or so seconds. I have yet to write a native report that takes more than 20 seconds and that 20 second report is getting data from 4 BO's and nets over 130K rows.
      Read full review

      Support Rating

      CloudApper

      No answers on this topic

      IBM

      The process does seem to take some time and has to go through a preset escalation process. IBM does a good job of communicating through the process, it just seems to take it's natural course.
      Read full review

      Implementation Rating

      CloudApper

      No answers on this topic

      IBM

      Do research on the client processes and determine which modules need to be implemented and in which order they should be implemented in.
      Read full review

      Alternatives Considered

      CloudApper

      They are almost similar, but the ability to customize the app in CloudApper is something really useful. You can customize the app to meet your individual business needs and the price is also very affordable. Imagine having access to all the apps you need for $10 a month.
      Read full review

      IBM

      Much faster web based program with more category options and ease of mass batch printing.
      Read full review

      Scalability

      CloudApper

      No answers on this topic

      IBM

      TRIRIGA can be split into many servers and is easily scaled over multiple environments. TRIRIGA is also capable of being implemented on multiple operating systems and a wide range of environments with different database management systems. This makes it easy for clients to choose since they can choose vendors they have previous relationships with or are required to use for various reasons.
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      CloudApper

      • ROI increase
      • Asset management transparency
      • Audits
      Read full review

      IBM

      • It's a positive and works well with the business.
      • It doesn't "stand out" from competitors but has great potential if updates were establisthed.
      • The pros outweigh the cons when using Tririga.
      Read full review

      Screenshots

      Add comparison