What users are saying about
1 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100
1 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

codeBeamer ALM

In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved.It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

Combined with Code Compare and running Review Assistant on the TFS server, it provides a good way to share code and comments amount our team. It does everything we need it to do for code reviews and has a reporting tool.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

codeBeamer ALM

  • Tracing of requirements.
  • Tracking of development.
  • Tracking of QA.
  • Tracking of bugs.
  • Tracking of releases.
  • Wiki.
  • Users and teams.
  • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
  • Testing and coverage for releases.
  • Integration with SVN.
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

  • Review Assistant does everything that I was hoping the default Visual Studio reviews would do. The iterations through accept/reject were the key winner.
  • The functionality for code reviews is great, especially the ability to comment on specific lines of code.
  • You don't have to leave the IDE.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

codeBeamer ALM

  • Search.
  • Metric calculation.
  • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

  • Integration with JIRA is missing.
  • Ability to search, filter and order comments.
  • There is no support for Visual Studio Code.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

codeBeamer ALM

codeBeamer ALM 6.4
Based on 1 answer
Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

codeBeamer ALM

codeBeamer ALM 9.1
Based on 1 answer
Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

codeBeamer ALM

codeBeamer is by far better.
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

Microsoft provides a handy feature for code review inside the Visual Studio IDE. Review Assistant, though providing a similar code review user experience, supports work scenarios that are not covered by the Microsoft's IDE. Moreover, the version control systems support is broader in Review Assistant.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

codeBeamer ALM

  • Customer tracking.
  • Process tracking.
  • Workflow framework.
  • Can be overhead.
Robert Jurjevic | TrustRadius Reviewer

Review Assistant

  • The tool saves a huge amount of time while reviewing the code. Review Assistant supports threaded comments, so team members can discuss code without scheduled meetings.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Pricing Details

codeBeamer ALM

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional

codeBeamer ALM Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details
Perpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.

Review Assistant

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Review Assistant Editions & Modules

Edition
10 Users License349.95
    Additional Pricing Details

    Add comparison