CoffeeCup HTML Editor vs. Overleaf

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoffeeCup HTML Editor
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
CoffeeCup Software offers the CoffeeCup HTML Editor, an HTML and CSS text and code editing option, featuring free and paid versions with more advanced features.N/A
Overleaf
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Overleaf is a collaborative writing and publishing system designed to make the process of producing academic papers much quicker for both authors and publishers, from Writelatex Limited in London.N/A
Pricing
CoffeeCup HTML EditorOverleaf
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoffeeCup HTML EditorOverleaf
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoffeeCup HTML EditorOverleaf
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
CoffeeCup HTML EditorOverleaf
Small Businesses
BBEdit
BBEdit
Score 8.2 out of 10
BBEdit
BBEdit
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
Vim
Vim
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoffeeCup HTML EditorOverleaf
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoffeeCup HTML EditorOverleaf
Likelihood to Recommend
CoffeeCup Software, Inc.
My typical use is to edit HTML and CFM pages from prior projects, and use them to create new ones. So, I rarely use the tools for designing pages provided in this application. I have found the ability to preview a page very useful. I am aware of numerous features in this editor, that simpler editors would not provide. It has proven to be a great fit for my use.
Read full review
Digital Science
Overleaf is good to use in a lot of scenarios where something is to be written as a group. However, I believe that it is only good up to a certain amount of people working on the document at once. While I am unsure when it becomes too much, I got no doubt that there is a limit for when it is that good. Though normally, our group size of up to six people has been fine to work with in Overleaf.
Read full review
Pros
CoffeeCup Software, Inc.
  • Easy to use editing features
  • Helpful analysis of code, and useful suggestions for corrections
  • Very useful split-screen preview of HTML code
  • Wizards to guide inserting tables, links, images, audio etc.
Read full review
Digital Science
  • Easy to get started and compile documents
  • Collaborative scientific writing
  • Latex documentation
  • Built in templates
  • Comments and chat features
Read full review
Cons
CoffeeCup Software, Inc.
  • Maybe I could list a con if my use of it was more diverse and consistent. It does everything and more for my purposes, and in ways I Iike very much.
Read full review
Digital Science
  • New user friendliness
  • More concise error messages
  • Layout
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CoffeeCup Software, Inc.
No answers on this topic
Digital Science
Overleaf promotes collaboration and has much better scientific formatting, which makes it great for research papers. It allows for much smoother and more professional looking documents, with easy to change and configure formatting. It is very difficult to insert mathematical formulas and long complex derivations in Microsoft Word, and formatting in Microsoft Word is also very finicky.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CoffeeCup Software, Inc.
  • This editor certainly saves time in reducing my need to know and/or check coding minutiae.
Read full review
Digital Science
  • Easier teamwork
  • Better looking reports
  • Better overview over document
Read full review
ScreenShots