(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter vs. Scalr

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco CloudCenter (formerly CliQr CloudCenter) was an application-defined cloud management platform for deploying and administration of applications across datacenters, private, and public cloud resources. It has been discontinued by Cisco, and is no longer available for sale.N/A
Scalr
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A solution to scale Terraform. Scalr is a platform used to design and implement Terraform to meet specific needs. Users can: Setup a workflow: Choose between the Terraform CLI, VCS-driven and module-based workspaces to deploy infrastructure. Authentication with provider configurations: Add each provider and manage credentials shared across multiple environments and workspaces. Create structure with Environments and Workspaces: Create…
$0
per month per run
Pricing
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterScalr
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterScalr
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterScalr
Considered Both Products
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
Chose (EOL) Cisco CloudCenter
We found that the cost advantages were greater by going with Cisco because of our present contracts and the materials and equipment we already had on hand. The reliability of the system, for us, outweighed any cost advantages we might have been realized by going with another …
Scalr

No answer on this topic

Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterScalr
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterScalr
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
(EOL) Cisco CloudCenterScalr
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It is well suited for large corporate entities, whether they are in manufacturing, sales, engineering, healthcare, supply or shipping. It is easy to understand and operate once it has been initially configured. Expansion of the system is likewise easy to do once expertise has been acquired. The only difficulty with this or any cloud scenario is ensuring where the data is located and managing that securely.
Read full review
Scalr
No answers on this topic
Pros
Cisco
  • We are able to automate deployment which has been a strength to the geographical distribution of the enterprise.
  • We have been able to work with a wider variety of developer tools and haven't had to customize to fit CloudCenter.
  • It is easier for us to allocate space and allow users to take advantage of the system directly with a minimum of overhead.
Read full review
Scalr
No answers on this topic
Cons
Cisco
  • The software and systems don't present a problem to us but the continued interaction with mid-level support teams and vendors can slow down implementation or correction of difficulties we experience.
  • The continued overhead associated with peripheral training on systems we have purchased can cause delays.
  • Language barriers sometimes show up but this, again, is due to remote middle agents that are themselves contractors of or sales agents of the main agency. It slows down communication and can introduce business difficulties.
Read full review
Scalr
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
We found that the cost advantages were greater by going with Cisco because of our present contracts and the materials and equipment we already had on hand. The reliability of the system, for us, outweighed any cost advantages we might have been realized by going with another provider. Certainly the service and support for the entire system is much better when handled by a single vendor with a good track record.
Read full review
Scalr
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • We have had a positive return on investment by adopting Cisco CloudCenter as the system is more mature than competitors. We have saved a lot by working with them rather than continuing to act as a defacto test location for other systems.
  • We have been able to reduce the number of staff necessary to operate the system and turn them over to more profitable work.
  • One negative impact we have seen is that it is difficult to map where the data is located at any specific instance.
Read full review
Scalr
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots