Interstage vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Interstage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Interstage from Fujitsu is a business operation platform.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Interstage
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
7.1
34 Ratings
11% below category average
IDE support00 Ratings6.231 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings5.232 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings8.134 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings7.133 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings7.123 Ratings
Best Alternatives
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.2
(41 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
InterstageOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Fujitsu
At the suggestion of the contractor (retailer), who has always entrusted us with the Internet environment, we set up this tower server. The CAL upgrade cost associated with upgrading the file server can be greatly reduced because the StrageServer operating system was given as a line. The operability of remote maintenance was also greatly improved by employing the associated management software (iRMC).
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
Fujitsu
  • It has a good user support team
  • The support system that more than makes up for it is the determining factor for the choice.
  • When a RAID disk or power supply failed, the maintenance service alerted me with a monitoring alarm and replaced it quickly before service was interrupted.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
Fujitsu
  • It has no effect on the run rate because it does everything correctly from detection to replacement before stopping
  • I think a more reliable unit can be used as a server computer.
  • It is more expensive than a model of equal characteristics from a foreign manufacturer.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The Admin UI should be further simplified, the UI design was not too user-friendly— too many options and clicks required, difficult for the new beginners to figure out what they are looking for.
  • The admin server becomes the single failure point, although Oracle suggested some workarounds by setting VIP and VHost, it was not quite easy and straight forward.
  • Domain replication is hard, requiring a lot of knowledge and scripts efforts.
  • Admin will hang if the node manager communication encounters some issues for one or some nodes in the domain/cluster.
  • Not able to kill/terminate the stuck thread, the only way is to restart the managed server (JVM)
  • License cost is too high, for small businesses.
Read full review
Usability
Fujitsu
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I would have given it a 10 but sometimes the hogging threads become a issue and needs server bounce. Except that, we are very pleased with the product.
Read full review
Performance
Fujitsu
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
Fujitsu
No answers on this topic
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Fujitsu
No answers on this topic
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Fujitsu
  • With respect to the backup system, I believe that relocation after the replacement was facilitated.
  • The best solution to the problem was that thanks to Fujitsu Interstage I created a separate cloud to store the data for each individual PC.
  • Being able to continue the tasks, without the interruption of service due to a hardware failure that was fixed very efficiently, demonstrates the quality of this company's operations.
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots