Kubecost vs. Oracle Real User Experience Insight

Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8

Incentivized

It supports multiple state-of-the-art technologies for data collection. It can support passive, zero-touch network data collection as well as various forms of Browser and Server instrumentation. The business, therefore, needs to start monitoring the experience of the real user. They need to set up Key Performance Indicators (KPI) that reflect the experience of the end-user. Service Level Agreements (SLAs) also need to be set up particularly at the business services level, in addition to the normal SLAs set up for the infrastructure availability and performance.

Incentivized

• Show namespace level cost and usage
• Allow rightisizibg At namespace level
• Show effectiveness of current resources allocation

Incentivized

• KPI dashboard
• Data Browser
• Performance and Violation Overview

Incentivized

• Agents installation and the ping fed integration
• The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use

Incentivized

• High cost.
• Training is very expensive.

Incentivized

Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers

Incentivized

ExtraHop. I did use it, but it projects almost the same matrix.

Incentivized

• Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency
• Save on cloud investment

Incentivized

• Executive dashboard.
• RUEI can be used to monitor end-user activity and business services.

Incentivized