TrustRadius

Kubecost vs. ProsperOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kubecost
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Founded by ex-Google cloud engineers and PMs, Stackwatch headquartered in San Francisco, aims to enable teams to operate Kubernetes and cloud native infrastructure at scale. Their flagship product Kubecost is presented as tooling and intelligence to manage cost, performance, reliability and other infrastructure operability challenges.
$449
per month
ProsperOps
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
ProsperOps is a fully autonomous cost optimization solution for Amazon Web Services (AWS) that helps organizations save money and manage risk. It aims to help customers increase their Effective Savings Rate by an average of 68%, returning material dollars back to their cloud budgets. At the same time, ProsperOps can reduce risk by aligning commitment timelines and shrinking term length. Using real-time telemetry from the user's cloud environment, ProsperOps…N/A
Pricing
KubecostProsperOps
Editions & Modules
Business
$449
per month 100 nodes
Enterprise
Custom Quote
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KubecostProsperOps
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KubecostProsperOps
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
KubecostProsperOps
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
ServiceNow IT Asset Management
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KubecostProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
KubecostProsperOps
Likelihood to Recommend
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ProsperOps
Our firm spends the majority of its cloud budget on EC2 instances, Fargate deployments, and Lambda executions. Automated modifications to discount portfolios based on changes in workloads allow ProsperOops to handle our shifting workloads with ease. In order to meet our net cloud budget requirements, it always follows a high-quality SP (Savings Plan) Portfolio management strategy.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Show namespace level cost and usage
  • Allow rightisizibg At namespace level
  • Show effectiveness of current resources allocation
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ProsperOps
  • The arbitrage strategy is effective. It's hard to believe how good the service is.
  • It is a plug-and-forget approach for ProsperOps.
  • It costs ProsperOps a percentage of the savings they make.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Agents installation and the ping fed integration
  • The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ProsperOps
  • The inclusion of RDS and Elasticache in cost management is something I'd be all for.
  • When it comes to EC2 capacity reservations, ProsperOps only includes reserved instances in the region where we are located.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ProsperOps
To see the aggregated costs on AWS billings, we may purchase the service through AWS Marketplace instead of viewing it in ProsperOps' dashboard. Now that we're using it for AWS, we're talking with our clients about adding it to Microsoft Azure, too, so that we can make use of the tool's cloud cost control and visibility capabilities.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost)
  • Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency
  • Save on cloud investment
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ProsperOps
  • Our Effective Savings Rate has risen since we started using ProsperOps.
  • Our AWS bill savings will cover the cost of the service.
  • As much as 95.4% of our compute on-demand costs are covered by ProsperOps, and all of the savings are put to good use.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots

ProsperOps Screenshots

Screenshot of