Kubecost vs. Superstream

Kubecost

2 Reviews and Ratings

Superstream

0 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Kubecost	Score 7.3 out of 10	N/A	Founded by ex-Google cloud engineers and PMs, Stackwatch headquartered in San Francisco, aims to enable teams to operate Kubernetes and cloud native infrastructure at scale. Their flagship product Kubecost is presented as tooling and intelligence to manage cost, performance, reliability and other infrastructure operability challenges.	$449 per month
Superstream	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Superstream Is An AI-based engine that reduces Kafka expenses and boosts its performance without changing a single component or an existing Kafka.	N/A

Pricing

Kubecost

Superstream

Editions & Modules

Business: $449
per month 100 nodes
Enterprise: Custom Quote

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Kubecost	Superstream
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Best Alternatives
	Kubecost	Superstream
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	ServiceNow IT Asset Management Score 8.7 out of 10	ServiceNow IT Asset Management Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.4 out of 10	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Kubecost	Superstream
Likelihood to Recommend	7.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Kubecost	Superstream
Likelihood to Recommend	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8 Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Superstream No answers on this topic
Pros	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Show namespace level cost and usage Allow rightisizibg At namespace level Show effectiveness of current resources allocation Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Superstream No answers on this topic
Cons	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Agents installation and the ping fed integration The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Superstream No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Superstream No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency Save on cloud investment Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Superstream No answers on this topic
ScreenShots