Kubecost vs. Zesty

Kubecost

2 Reviews and Ratings

Zesty

1 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Kubecost	Score 7.3 out of 10	N/A	Founded by ex-Google cloud engineers and PMs, Stackwatch headquartered in San Francisco, aims to enable teams to operate Kubernetes and cloud native infrastructure at scale. Their flagship product Kubecost is presented as tooling and intelligence to manage cost, performance, reliability and other infrastructure operability challenges.	$449 per month
Zesty	Score 7.0 out of 10	N/A	Zesty is a first cloud management platform from the company of the same name in Giv'atayim, Israel, that leverages AI-driven automation to increase efficiency and reduce AWS spend, with the goal of reducing it by over 50%. The platform automatically adjusts compute and storage resources to match real-time application needs, with no human input.	N/A

Pricing

Kubecost

Zesty

Editions & Modules

Business: $449
per month 100 nodes
Enterprise: Custom Quote

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Kubecost	Zesty
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Discounts available for annual pricing.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Kubecost	Zesty
Top Pros	No answers on this topic	Pro Turnkey solution Pro Quick and simple Pro Simple to implement
Top Cons	No answers on this topic	Minus Exporting the data

Best Alternatives
	Kubecost	Zesty
Small Businesses	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Medium-sized Companies	IBM Turbonomic Score 8.5 out of 10	IBM Turbonomic Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.3 out of 10	vRealize Operations (discontinued) Score 8.3 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Kubecost	Zesty
Likelihood to Recommend	7.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Kubecost	Zesty
Likelihood to Recommend	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Well suited for a k8 platform and the clients on the platform however doesn’t help as much for a total enterprise cloud cost that is not running on k8 Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Zesty.co No answers on this topic
Pros	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Show namespace level cost and usage Allow rightisizibg At namespace level Show effectiveness of current resources allocation Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Zesty.co No answers on this topic
Cons	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Agents installation and the ping fed integration The amount of CPU Kubecost agents use Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Zesty.co No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Namespace cost, usage and efficiency data and ability to optimize for k8 containers Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Zesty.co No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Stackwatch, Inc (Kubecost) Allowed individual teams to better their cloud architecture for cost efficiency Save on cloud investment Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Zesty.co No answers on this topic
ScreenShots