Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
$5
Per User Per Month
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Microsoft SharePoint
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Plan 1
$5.00
Per User Per Month
Plan 2
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Per User Per Month
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SharePoint
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
With MS-Project, only a select few people had licenses, and they distributed PDF copies that were immediately obsolete. We used SharePoint for a ticket system and it was adequate for those working in a silo, but we are working as part of a larger project, so being able to link …
We moved from excel trackers and SharePoint Classic forms/lists to Wrike. We were never able to create a branching logic request form so it was long and cumbersome. We had to manually put together excel sheets from several sources to report out our work so leadership had little …
We chose Wrike after careful software selection with three other products. The goal is to identify and define a working standard for greater efficiency during the definition, planning, execution, monitoring, and finalization of products. Wrike proved to be the best and easiest …
monday.com is useful for other project management needs. However, we've found that Wrike is best for creative project management and cross-collaborative initiatives. Our project management team believes it's also the best platform for resource management and the ability to see …
I was not a part of the decision to choose Wrike over Asana. I know we reevaluate this decision every year. Asana has a much more attractive price point for what we need and is very competitive in that way against Wrike. I think we continue to use Wrike because we do not have …
Better in resourcing worse in scheduling, both better and worse in terms of use control it is easier to move tasks in Wrike but also easier to make mistakes, the snapshot function is a bigf benefit compared to others, lacks against deltek in reports for EV or actuals dd dd
Jira required too many third party integrations in order for us to be able to do what we can do with Wrike right out of the box! Wrike works seamlessly with the rest of the Microsoft suite we use, and the Teams integration keeps our team on task and our business partners …
I have noticed that Microsoft Teams requires searching and doesn't allow for quick referencing of data files. I am annoyed by the fact that I have to constantly scroll through prior messages or try to find a specific message. I also do not like the fact that if there was a …
While Slack is mostly a chat tool, it also had use for organising teams working on specific jobs. Wrike works in the same way, while also being a secure place to store documents and complete workflows. The security and all-in-one nature of Wrike means it is doing the job of Slac…
Wrike blows Basecamp out of the water. It's very user-friendly and easy to find and manage your workload. It makes document management and the review process SO MUCH EASIER.
Multi level tiers and subtask was virtually non-existent in ZenDesk, Their bulleting system was horrible and task just welded together in long paragraphs that went on forever. It was too confusing and the only way to keep track was to print and highlight different parts of task …
We looked at multiple produce, specifically Microsoft Project and Clarizen Go. Wrike had the customization we needed along with the support staff and training to implement the product. The user interface is great with many views available, including custom views. The built-in …
Verified User
Administrator
Chose Wrike
In my opinion Wrike is just as user friendly and has fantastic automations that work well for my company and team.
I have used both Clarizen and Microsoft Project. I think that Wrike falls between these two platforms. Wrike is easily a better tool to use than MS Project, but I think it lacks some of the expanded capabilities that support PM work that Clarizen has--such as capacity planning, …
Verified User
Project Manager
Chose Wrike
Wrike is more intuitive to use and has A LOT more functionality, such as collaboration and integration with other apps.
We were utilizing a SharePoint form and list to manage work previously to Wrike. SharePoint did not allow for creative proofing or collaboration. It really was nothing more than a glorified spreadsheet. Obviously, Wrike is much better for us.
Very user friendly. If you're already using M365 products it offers great integration! If you're using Azure AD it offers SSO for IAM and integrates nicely with Azure AD Groups which can then be used for Access management. As our IT / Azure Administrator, I particularly like the "sharing link" options where you can send a link with an expiration date and not have to remember to remove the link / access after a project / business case scenario is over.
Wrike is very well suited for such business cases where it requires project management, task management, team collaboration, time tracking, customisation in the views but when it comes to extensive workflow automation along with its interaction to other tools then it lacks behind sometimes as all the features are not possible internally through automation and we require additional tools like workato to connect wrike with other tools.
Overall Wrike's interface is very friendly. I will log into Wrike and not be overwhelmed by the tasks that lie ahead. I know where to go to find the tasks that are assigned to me and Wrike's workspace and folder structure allow me to help keep tasks organized.
Wrike is intuitive. When creating a task, populating a name, assignee, start and end dates, and a description just makes sense. Compared to other tools, Wrike is very easy to use.
Dashboard functionality - the ability to create custom dashboards to see what tasks are assigned to certain users.
I think it is easy for tasks to fall through the cracks. With custom dashboards, we are able to avoid this issue
Multiple instances.
We have many clients and being able to switch between instances by the click of a button makes it really easy. In the past, we were using a different project management tool than our clients and we were needing to transfer information from one place to another. This created inefficiencies.
Customization.
Within each project, you can create different views of the task. This allows us to really only display what is really needed to be seen by the team.
Non-technical users may require more governance, as they primarily need to focus on their tasks and collaborate effectively. Their Wrike landing page should be simplified.
The extensive flexibility and information can overwhelm new users, leading to potential issues with task and date modifications.
Learning the tools often involves creating unnecessary projects and tasks.
A staging environment alongside the production environment would be beneficial for learning and experimenting before going live.
It's integral to our business. It's already included with most of the Office 365 licensing we buy, so the cost is effectively zero. It stores our files, it is the foundation for custom applications, and Microsoft only continues to enhance its functionality and its connections to other Microsoft tools. SharePoint just keeps getting better and better.
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths
As mentioned earlier, I have used other platforms like Workfront, Jira, and Slack for project and task management. However, I would definitely go for Wrike because it makes things easier for marketers, stakeholders, and users. I love it. You are doing amazing work. Continue building on that, and I am sure you will be one of the best project management tools on the market.
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.
I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
The reasons for selecting MS SharePoint are: SharePoint provides ease of use and web design assistance and support SharePoint helps you schedule your content for publishing. enables users to share documents with external parties and offers a better internal structure of the content and better indexing and searching capabilities.
Neither Jira nor Asana are user-friendly. There are too many layers without visualizing the broader relationship among tasks. I did not actively want to engage with either of these tools. However, I don't view project management as a burden with Wrike. It makes my job more manageable instead of further complicating it.
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Increased collaboration - MS Sharepoint has increased knowledge share and collaboration between departments. This saves time and energy because of its efficient and effective communication
Increased document security - MS Sharepoint has increased our document security so we're safer knowing that our documents are security and access controlled appropriately. We are less prone to get in trouble by our customers due to the security provided by MS Sharepoint
Negative Impact Compared to other software - Not sure if the MS Sharepoint's main functionalities could've been met with other tools we currently have
We have been able to use Wrike to prioritize tasks for departments. Some departments are overwhelmed with other tasks and being able to save the staff some time by prioritizing their tasks has been helpful.
Collaboration and communication have improved between the project teams.
Wrike made it easier to access past information to reference for future preparation or to help clarify.
