Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Zoom Workplace, Zoom’s open collaboration platform with an AI Companion, empowers teams to be more productive, and strengthen customer relationships throughout the customer lifecycle with Zoom’s Business Services for sales, marketing, and customer experience teams, including Zoom Contact Center.
$16.99
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft Teams
Zoom Workplace
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Add-On Zoom Translated Captions
$5
per month per license
Pro
$16.99
per month per user
Business
$21.99
per month per user
Add-On - Conference Room Connector
$499
per year
Basic
Free
Enterprise
Custom
Add-On - Zoom Whiteboard
starting at $2.49
per month per user
Add-On - Large Meetings
starting at $600
per year
Add-On - Cloud Storage
starting at $120
per year
Add-On Audio Conferencing
starting at $1200
per year
Add-On Zoom Phone Power Pack
Starting at $300
per year per user
Add-On - Quality of Service Subscription
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams
Zoom Workplace
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
The two products are similar. Zoom has its place in the workplace. It is different from Microsoft Teams. It is more useful for personal use in our environment. Most outside organizations and individuals will have the capability to obtain the product and connect with an entity …
Zoom was the first virtual web program I used, and I still use it for some parts of my job, but I like how chat is included with Teams. Our whole department isn't in the same building, so it is convenient to send a message instead of picking up the phone or even just sending an …
Microsoft Teams is better than both Zoom and Google Meets to me. It seems to have the functionality of both these platforms and also that of Slack for internal messaging. It's more of a "one-stop-shop" for both these needs which makes it a handy piece of software for use in the …
Teams is generally better and has a more professional "feel" than Skype, Google Meet, or Zoom. With Teams, access control is less easily managed than with Skype, Google Meet, or Zoom. Teams has better internal security than Zoom. I have never been "bombed" on Teams, whereas …
Microsoft Team is one of Microsoft's newest applications. Looking at the evolution of the Office suite, I can only imagine what Team will become with the next updates. It's a product that fills a need and has a lot of possibilities to evolve well. I would put it right in the …
The Teamwork was introduced to the company earlier. Sr. Management pulled training sessions through marketing and digital advertising department. Most of the company's projects were posted on the Teamwork. It is the company's project management space. If Microsoft Teams …
Zoom was mostly used for overseas meetings upon customer request.
Verified User
Account Manager
Chose Microsoft Teams
For me, Teams is also very useful and very user friendly just like the others.
Verified User
Team Lead
Chose Microsoft Teams
As mentioned, Microsoft Teams [has] been our way of communication since the start of the pandemic. We've been using this and so far it never fails us and even exceeds our expectations. The scheduling and meeting notification is very helpful [for] reminders, especially for days …
Microsoft teams provide better customer support and seamless screen sharing. It provides good audio and video quality even in low networks. Even it can be integrated with other Microsoft software like outlook and office, which made our life easy. Its UI is very simple and can …
Verified User
Professional
Chose Microsoft Teams
We used a very old version of Lifesize. Microsoft Teams is more modern, so this is not really a fair comparison. Teams does the same and so much more! Again, being part of the Office 365 E3 offering meant we had it available anyway.
It's hard to think of an app that doesn't do a better job at video conferencing than Microsoft Teams. Zoom, Skype, and Webex are the three I'm most familiar with. All three provide far more stabilization, better screen sharing options, better chat functions, and are less …
Verified User
Professional
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams seems to be on par with Zoom and Google Meetings as far as meetings and discussions go, but it seems to be superior to the other platforms as far as document sharing and collaboration go.
We didn't really evaluate any platforms like Microsoft Teams. It was really replacing the multiple systems we were using prior to the Teams implementation including Skype for Business, OneNote, and manually sending documents back and forth. Microsoft Teams has cut down on the …
Nothing does all of this. This is very nice if you're already invested in lots of Microsoft stuff (as most big organizations are). I'm honestly a little confused what's going on with Skype for Business since Teams seems to accomplish relatively the same thing, but with MUCH …
Slack is a little more user-friendly and has way more integrations. For example, we use Gmail, and Google products don't integrate with Microsoft Teams, so we lost that functionality. But Slack is also really expensive, and Microsoft Teams has a much better free plan. It's a …
Teams does a much better job of having all tools readily available. It allows use across other platforms and communication with those outside of my organization as well.
Lead Blockchain Technology and Cryptocurrency/cryptoassets Manager
Chose Microsoft Teams
As a Microsoft Office user for 12+ years, Microsoft has done a lot to innovate their productivity platform. In particular, Office 365 has tons of differentiated value:
Unlimited upgrade rights to the latest versions is very impressive as no other types of productivity software …
Zoom Workplace was in place before we had Microsoft Teams, so it was grandfathered in. But when comparing Zoom Workplace to meetings features in our various phone systems over the years, as well as meeting platforms like UberConference, gotomeeting and MS Teams - I think Zoom …
Verified User
Employee
Chose Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace is cheaper and easier to implement than Microsoft Teams.
Zoom Workplace's call handling, ease of use, meetings, and better contact center integration are head and shoulders above Microsoft. We were tired of the limitations of the Teams software and haven't looked back since we made the switch from Microsoft Teams to Zoom Workplace.
zoom stands out in some features very implicitly. zoom provides an all-in-one solution. Whatever tools I have used earlier, they are also good, but have many limitations. Zoom, I get everything I want in one place. video quality is nice, recording is good, access is good, and …
Cost and easy user interface. customer support is easily reachable. Value for money. User management, Phone management, profile management and storage of cloud recording, which are all located in one single portal which is easy to manage. It can be synced or integrated with …
Zoom Workplace meetings, filters, etc. are much better than Slack and Teams. However, channels, DMs, and anything around conversations are far behind those platforms. Would really like to also see the platform push more towards being a broader workspace app first so that it …
I think Zoom Workplace is far superior. In my opinion, Performance is better. Compatibility with system hardware is better. Overall, in my experience, is a far better user experience
Zoom is much better for the bigger events and training sessions along with townhalls etc we actually use meet for our internal meetings and general use because Zoom was not as good for that purpose however its been irreplaceable in that area mainly due to the Pigeonhole Live …
Zoom Workplace is a one-stop shop for conferencing and phone needs--and with Zoom being a global name in the industry, there is no bounds to its reach and compatibility. Simply put, it just works, and Zoom's plan offerings are a steal in comparison to purchasing separate …
The ability to set up a user with a phone number and extension and the communication is better than teams. We were able to remove physical phones and replace everything with the app or headsets that connect via Bluetooth. The versatility and the scaling is unmatched for us. You …
The user interface for Zoom Workplace is much easier to use for our employee base. As we looked at these other platforms, they were just not intuitive to use. There were strange processes to escalate from a chat to a call or a meeting or screen sharing was not intuitive and …
Zoom has the easiest screensharing. In-call messaging is similar across all platforms. Both Zoom and Teams capture in-call chats, which is very helpful if something was missed on the call, you can go back and find the message. Chime is the most challenging to use, but this …
Zoom Workplace had a better price, better customer service and they were able to help with what we needed. We already had a certain amount of staff that needed certain things. Zoom Workplace was able to provide what we needed for a price that fit within out budget.
Zoom Workplace is superior in my opinion. It is the best for training clients and allows for annotation. Teams does not allow you to annotate and that makes it VERY hard to direct someone where to go on a screen.
Zoom is very similar and has great features. We generally prefer Teams because that is what we use company-wide for messaging communications. When using Teams, it shows your availability automatically and it is easy to save chats and messages from a meeting for future use. Some …
Battle tested + Popular brand "Zoom", in a nutshell. While MS teams and WebEx are popular in the corporate world, it is Zoom Workplace that has a much broader and overall appeal. Jitsi Meet seems to have the least recall (overall) so far. And given the marginal price …
Microsoft team is a bit complicated to use. Not a lot of people are used to using it. Plus you need to have Microsoft 365 which is expensive for the company as well as the employees. Zoom is very simple. Least amount of training is required and it is easily accessible to …
Teams is inferior to other platforms like Slack for messaging or Zoom. If it were up to me, I'd use Zoom for video conferencing as it's better for large groups and online training, and cleaner. Slack would be my preferred tool for chat as it's much easier to create channels, push notifications for teams, and integrations with other tools like Seismic.
Integration with other products and the AI summaries have been huge wins for Zoom Workplace in our organization. They have been life changing for our team. Also, being able to make and receive calls from our cell phones rather than have to give out personal cell phone numbers has been wildly successful with our attorneys.
I love how easy it is to set the focus on the presenter. It is annoying when people don't spotlight themselves as a presenter, so you get to see the whole gallery of attendees in smaller, two-inch windows.
I like the capability of having break-out rooms. Even though I don't use them very often, it is nice to have them available if the right situation presents itself for smaller group chats.
The recording quality is better than I have experienced with other products (Microsoft Teams, WebEx, etc.), and the fact that it is already an MP4, so I don't have to convert it for publishing on our intranet is huge to me.
Microsoft Teams does rely on internet quality, so If you are needing information on found in Teams and your internet is down or choppy, you wont be able to access those files unlike if they were stored directly on your computer or network.
Some of the user interface of Microsoft Teams is not user friendly, it can take a long time to figure out how to use some tool even if you are using the help or troubleshooting.
Some of the Microsoft Teams features are limited to anyone using the free version vs. paid. With the paid, you have more storage, more video time, more tools. It would be nice to see the free version have the same features and ability.
Allow a way to group individual people chats - not channels just individual peeps into groups for ease of finding - like how you can group shared calendars into sections in Outlook
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
We're sticking with Zoom for the foreseeable future--given its compelling feature set, ease of use, and advanced technology, there's just no other competition to be excited about. Plus it's a Gartner-recognized industry leader, so it's a rather easy choice.
I personally have not come across a comparable platform that does what Microsoft Teams does and I believe there are very few competitors that offer the integration and user-friendly features that Microsoft Teams provides. You don't need to have special training to successfully benefit from Microsoft Teams features. If you can text, you can Microsoft Teams chat. If you can make a phone call, you can make a Microsoft Teams call - I think that in itself grants the platform a 10/10 rating for me.
Zoom is made for the non tech office. It has features that can be made to do what you need to run things on a day to day basis. Immediately we we able to get meetings going with remote employees. The ability to be able to add smartphone connected people was a big plus. Zoom met our needs at the time.
There have been less than a handful of outages during our two years with Zoom, and whenever there was one, an email informing us of the outage went out immediately, and they had the issue resolved shortly thereafter.
Zoom has among the best performance of any video conference platform, as I've mentioned several times. Besides that, their Chat platform works great, and their back end always runs smooth. It's unfortunate that reporting can now only be done by one month at a time, but nonetheless, it only takes a second to run any kind of Zoom report, whether it's an attendee report, Poll results, a user report, a list of meetings from the past month, etc.
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Because I got a response right away, and was assigned one specific individual to work with me from the beginning to the resolution. I had an actual email address and direct contact with this person without having to start over and over every time I contacted Zoom - this singular individual remained attentive and was well informed on the subject matter and quite able to resolve my needs.
If you receive any pushback from higher ups, point to any of the various positive reviews like this one. Or show Zoom's excellent Gartner report, or articles describing Zoom's partnership with Sequoia capital. It's not difficult to show how Zoom is a trustworthy industry leader with best-in-class technology.
We chose primarily because of the promised integration with the Microsoft Business Suite - which it mostly delivers on. That does give Teams an obvious advantage over competitors. IMHO Teams has a richer, more mature feature set, and the experience is more reliable and stable. Although like any of there there is room for imporvement.
Zoom Workplace is typically on the more expensive end against other options, but it's the industry leader for a reason. It has the most brand credibility by far, but that doesn't mean it's perfect. There are limitations when it comes to technical performance, customization and video/audio quality. I prefer Slack myself for communication apps, but Zoom Workplace is a good alternative.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
The billing and price model is really fair for so many functions that they offer, our remote work requires each of the features that Zoom offers, so accepting payment for a tool like this is the least we can do. I like that billing arrives on time and that they offer opportunities and payment times.
Because the Basic licenses are completely free, and because it's very easy to configure and install Zoom, and because anyone can join Zoom from a link without needing an account, scaling is a Breeze. There are absolutely no roadblocks. My company keeps adding more Zoom Pro license every week since it's so in demand. We were able to convert users from several different platforms onto Zoom with no trouble at all.
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Zoom is perfect for our business. We use it to video chat with prospective clients. The name recognition alone gives us credibility and it is very easy to screen share and send content out.