Imperva CDN vs. Oracle Audit Vault and Database Firewall

I recommend it as a WAF, but not as a CDN. There are better CDNs, in my case I use transparentCDN (now www.transparentedge.eu) and Edgecast (now Verizon CDN).

Incentivized

Any serious small or large business that is utilizing a mainstream database, purchase ordering system, and web platform should look into this software - especially if you're using softwares compliant with this protector. It really does do an outstanding job of addressing all weaknesses through auditing and vaulting the potential virus concerns.

Incentivized

• Reliability / Uptime
• Security

Incentivized

• Error messages are very understandable, providing you are in the loop.
• The more you [use] it, the more comfortable you feel with the product.
• It is logical.

Incentivized

• CDN functionalities are secondary and cannot be compared to a top-level CDN.
• The WebGUI interface of the dashboard is very improvable. They have been changing the UX for years and it is disjointed and with services that have not yet been migrated.
• The analysis of WAF attack logs is insufficient. It is difficult to analyze attacks of past hours, event filters are missing. It is complicated to analyze the chronology of an attack.
• There are extra modules to improve the attack logs analysis but they are expensive and add little.

Incentivized

• Ability to drive lower than metadata levels
• Cost issues with coverage to multiple targets

Incentivized

Also TransparentCDN (now www.transparentedge.eu ) and Level 3

Incentivized

We did not evaluate other alternatives since most of our related products are Oracle.

Incentivized

• It's an expensive product if you have a lot of traffic volume, but I feel confident with their WAF.

Incentivized

• Systems Infrastructure Protection
• Multi-faceted Security for Complex Infrastructures
• Favorable Internal User Experience & Management

Incentivized