Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Proofpoint Emerging Threat Intelligence

Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.

Incentivized

Despite the fact that it is a program that monitors work at all times, I have not felt that it violates my privacy and hinders my work or makes it impossible for me to do so. For this and because it looks phenomenal when acting, I give it a 9 and I recommend the final consumer to try it to give an extra barrier to checking their emails in detection of extra malware that their antivirus does not do.

Incentivized

• Threat intelligence
• Emerging Threats
• Intelligence feeds

Incentivized

• Mitigation Email notification
• Quarantine ITEMS

Incentivized

• third party product integration
• simplicity of the managment console
• integration to cortex agents directly

Incentivized

• I think is perfect now Specially for end users
• Probably better communication before send updates to end users

Incentivized

If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.

Incentivized

more than against them is to complement secure solution adding one more layer to filter more threats with NordLayer connection secure gateways on internet !!!

Incentivized

• Cheap for us
• Easy integration
• Easy management

Incentivized

• For sure tons of man hours form equal to $$ for IT department

Incentivized