Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Secureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
AutoFocus™ contextual threat intelligence service, from Palo Alto Networks, accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.N/A
Secureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Secureworks® Counter Threat Unit™ research team identifies lessons learned and shares notable developments in threat behaviors, the global threat landscape, and security trends.N/A
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSecureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSecureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSecureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSecureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Small Businesses
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 7.8 out of 10
Egnyte
Egnyte
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSecureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocusSecureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)
Likelihood to Recommend
Palo Alto Networks
Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.
Read full review
SecureWorks
No answers on this topic
Pros
Palo Alto Networks
  • Threat intelligence
  • Emerging Threats
  • Intelligence feeds
Read full review
SecureWorks
No answers on this topic
Cons
Palo Alto Networks
  • third party product integration
  • simplicity of the managment console
  • integration to cortex agents directly
Read full review
SecureWorks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Palo Alto Networks
If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.
Read full review
SecureWorks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Palo Alto Networks
  • Cheap for us
  • Easy integration
  • Easy management
Read full review
SecureWorks
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots