Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Digital Vaccine (ThreatDV)

Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.

Incentivized

The inspection of data packets before they enter the firewall is a really beneficial to our security team. It segments the data from the LAN and really adds a great layer of security on top of our firewall. The technical support is very responsive and knowledgeable in use case of the product

Incentivized

• Threat intelligence
• Emerging Threats
• Intelligence feeds

Incentivized

• third party product integration
• simplicity of the managment console
• integration to cortex agents directly

Incentivized

If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.

Incentivized

• Cheap for us
• Easy integration
• Easy management

Incentivized