Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Trellix Change Control

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
McAfee Change Control
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Change Control (formerly McAfee, or Solidcore S3 Control) delivers continuous, enterprise-wide detection of authorized changes as they occur. It blocks unauthorized changes to critical system files, directories, and configurations while streamlining the implementation of new policies and compliance measures.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformTrellix Change Control
Editions & Modules
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnsibleMcAfee Change Control
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformTrellix Change Control
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformTrellix Change Control
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Score 8.7 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.6 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformTrellix Change Control
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(63 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(2 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(3 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformTrellix Change Control
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
The thing I mentioned earlier where we're constantly dealing with federal regulations or new agents that they want us to install and deploy and just getting those out in a consistent manner in a canned installation via Playbook is ideal
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
It gives more power to IT to track security breaches. Alerts make the job easier by ensuring that a constant overwatch is not needed. Gives a security boost with respect to adding policies as to what changes are allowed and what is not allowed especially when it comes to registry keys which is very crucial.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • Makes it easy to create and share automation in one central hub.
  • Ansible content collections give me the ability to reuse code, making it rapid to carry out complex IT processes.
  • Event-driven automation allows me to reduce manual tasks: it is rapid to know which action to take and respond automatically by receiving events from external apps automatically.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Track Content Change
  • Change Alerts
  • Easy to get started with
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Workflows should have more flexible paths than just success or failure.
  • The upgrade process can be challenging with differences in security and environment.
  • There is an opportunity to add CICD functionality into the tool.
  • For development, it would be nice to have the option of editing a repo directly from AAP to allow quick tests/reruns. Then, allow it to push the updates back or create a new branch/PR in GitHub.
  • The RBAC is good but could use improvements. One example would be an option that allows admins to assume the access of another user to validate it works as expected.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Support on MacOS
  • Overhaul intrusion detection
  • Can work on interactive UI
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are deploying Ansible at all levels of the organization
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
The easy tool it is, performance which is smooth, not much expertise needed, change alerts are great and the policies can be flexibly changed.
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
the yaml is easy to write and most people can be taught to write basic playbooks in a few weeks
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Easy peasy and smooth. I don't have to worry about extensive memory consumption because it does not need much and yet provides pretty fast and smooth experience .
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Never really needed for a support, but they do look to have good support parameters.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
AAP doesn't truly stack up against any of the products mentioned except for Aria Automation. But, it is extensible and open and has a lower cost to entry.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
It is an easy tool to use that makes a huge difference, easy setup, and does not consume much memory. The performance is smooth which is difficult to see in all the other similar tools. Its real-time and continuous updates on changes when changes are made while keeping options to update the policies to change files gives users a lot of options to be happy with.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers automation and ML tools that allow me to automate complex IT tasks.
  • Through automation analytics, it is seamless to gain full visibility into automation performance allowing me to make informed decisions.
  • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform allows me to move rapidly from insights to action.
  • Creating and sharing automation content in one place unify a team in one place hence enhancing real-time collaboration.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Feels more secure
  • More power to IT to track breaches
  • More control over company policies
Read full review
ScreenShots