AppsFlyerPricing

know where each feature is. It is also not easy to figure out how certain values are calculated.

e-commerce industry. It is less appropriate for websites-only businesses and cost-effective businesses. … the negative points. Cost factor for business is again a negative point. … Except for integration challenges, compatibility, and cost-effectiveness, I don'

information related to the aforementioned campaigns. We use it to set the key values and objectives of each campaign and keep a good tracking of its performance

Additionally, we are able to attribute paid marketing dollars and see the value of our app users. … reporting at times Pricing … Positive - incorporating app users to customer lifetime value cycle Positive -

priority vs. a secondary priority for other companies such as Branch. The pricing structure of AppsFlyer is also very reasonable compared with other attribution

Adwords as well as Facebook campaigns. It sure is pricey and it might be affordable only for enterprises. It might not be budget-friendly for small-scale

of course, be customized precisely to your needs, but at an incremental cost.

suited for small or large companies based on pricing and features. AppsFlyer had the most transparent pricing structures compared to others which we greatly … chose to tracking our mobile apps. AppsFlyer also had the most affordable and transparent pricing than others we evaluated.…

is by far the best one because of ease of use. They have great cost aggregation, are cheap to use, and have strong technical expertise and a good customer … We use this for attribution, spend, cost aggregation, and fraud detection. It used to understand which par…

Visualization of results isn't super clear. Cost integrations are sometimes not as granular as I want. Agency integration

startup-friendly in terms of budget and it's exactly what we are looking for. The price points are crystal clear. For an app developer looking to start paid advertising … It was priced well with great support so it was a no brainer for us to go with AppsfFyer &he…

export. Cohort data is available. Dashboard view that is very easy to use. Cost attribution to each partner. … reports. Price. I heard a lot of mobile app clients has to pay very high price to use Appsflyer as their attribution. Customer service. It takes a while … appro…

Protect360 should come included, instead of as an added fee. Visually seeing cohorted data should be as easy as Adjust's.

Pricing model - it's high, need to have a reasonable pricing model Simple UI - need a bit simpler UI for better

focused much on post install events, AppsFlyer is not recommended as the most cost effective tool.

Pricing. Customization of dashboards. Possibility to have data for all our apps

For the price and the usability.

Attribution Events tracking Reporting Cost analysis … compare the sources and see which ones have the potential to scale as per your value or volume targets.

ROAS User retention Cost effectiveness

reports and APIs were inconsistent. (i.e., One level would contain an asset value while others would not). Changes to the reporting/API schema weren't well

Seamless integration with Facebook Ads, Google and Twitter Ads Affordable pricing structure … Increase in number of non organic installs Decrease the cost of installation by 25%

tools such as deep linking to drive users to specific in-app feature. See cost and revenue by channel.

channels CAC LTV and not overspend on channels basis their own analysis of cost per order etc. No negative ROI at this moment. … and requires a lot of manual work to do analysis. Kochava is much more expensive for the same type of services, hence we prefer AppsFlyer which…

Kochava was bad. A lot of bugs at that time, and it charges for every event triggered. We used Kochava for only around 6 months and

Kind of expensive, especially for SMBs I’m not a huge fan of the dashboard UI and the mobile