SCCM: the market leader of client automation and management
Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager
We use SCCM for a number of different use cases including imaging, OS and software deployments, inventory and desktop management. Its primary function is to push new software to the fleet. The benefit is being able to time when and what gets deployed and make it done in an automated fashion. We also use it to manage to patch existing software packages (in conjunction with a product called Ninite).
Pros
- You are able to create queries to identify almost any combination of computers needed.
- Its direct tie to active directory.
- It fully leverages Windows functionality.
Cons
- Its mac integrations, though improving, are really not much more than inventory.
- It could benefit from an enterprise remote control solution more similar to Bomgar or LogMeIn.
- Its web interface for reporting is very dated.
- We are able to support hundreds of computers per FTE more than if we did not have an automation tool.
- ZENworks Configuration Management (f.k.a. Novell ZENworks Configuration Mgmt.)
We were a ZENworks shop previously. With our strong tie to Novell that made sense, but as we left Netware and its enterprise directory it made sense to leave Zenworks. At the time, I would have said that ZENworks was a more mature tool and I haven't kept up with their feature offering. But in the 8 years SCCM has really matured and become an incredible offering. There is a reason they are the market leader.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation