We did it! Successfully implemented multi-country sites (9) using Sitefinity.
Overall Satisfaction with Progress Sitefinity
We use Sitefinity as our sole CMS tool, to build and maintain websites in 11 different countries. We will be deploying another 9 sites by end of Q1, 2017. Our company had two different CMS systems and we wanted to cut costs and complexity, by supporting one CMS tool. We consolidated to Sitefinity. Additionally, the other CMS tool was not PCI compliant. By consolidating to Sitefinity we are now compliant.
Pros
- Easy to implement other .net solutions into the platform.
- Progress Sitefinity played well with the new responsive design we were implementing.
- New page templates can be built and utilized very quickly.
Cons
- We struggle with the technical support, and sometimes find that our knowledge of the product surpasses that of the technical support person on the phone.
- We decided to use a third party search because the search engine in Sitefinity did not meet our needs.
- At times we see latency issues with our sites. To date, we have not been able to isolate the cause.
- We have not gotten site sync to work properly for us.
- We were able to eliminate one of our CMS platforms, which in turn saved us a significant amount of $$ as well as support effort.
We evaluated, and had been using RedDot, when we decided to implement Sitefininty.
We liked the fact that Sitefinity is .net based, as we are a .net IT shop. Sitefinity was easy to implement and lent itself well to our new responsive design position. Sitefinity has more features available, is a growing product, whereas RedDot seems to be dying product line for OpenText.
We liked the fact that Sitefinity is .net based, as we are a .net IT shop. Sitefinity was easy to implement and lent itself well to our new responsive design position. Sitefinity has more features available, is a growing product, whereas RedDot seems to be dying product line for OpenText.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation