Adeptia Connect vs. Apache Camel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adeptia Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Adeptia in Chicago offers their B2B integration solution to enables enterprises to accelerate customer data onboarding from months to a matter of minutes. Adeptia Connect provides a simple user interface (a front-end) to manage all external connections and data interfaces for a company. It provides self-service partner on boarding and no-code approach that enables business users from a company and its partners to view, setup and manage data connections with each other.N/A
Apache Camel
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Apache Camel is an open source integration platform.N/A
Pricing
Adeptia ConnectApache Camel
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adeptia ConnectApache Camel
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adeptia ConnectApache Camel
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Adeptia ConnectApache Camel
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.3 out of 10
Anypoint Platform
Anypoint Platform
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.2 out of 10
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
TIBCO B2B Integration Solution
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adeptia ConnectApache Camel
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(3 ratings)
7.7
(11 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adeptia ConnectApache Camel
Likelihood to Recommend
Adeptia
I recommend the program for an advanced stage, it is not a program for small companies, it is a program for medium or large companies where you know about data and its flow in which you need to make the leap to a 3.0 level of the same.I could immediately recommend it to colleagues for its great storage capacity and agile control.
Read full review
Apache
Message brokering across different systems, with transactionality and the ability to have fine tuned control over what happens using Java (or other languages), instead of a heavy, proprietary languages. One situation that it doesn't fit very well (as far as I have experienced) is when your workflow requires significant data mapping. While possible when using Java tooling, some other visual data mapping tools in other integration frameworks are easier to work with.
Read full review
Pros
Adeptia
  • End users can set up pipelines within Gap to connect without having to use professional services.
  • Users can simply select a particular template.
  • Let's say that data integration calculates and configures a data flow very easily.
Read full review
Apache
  • Camel has an easy learning curve. It is fairly well documented and there are about 5-6 books on Camel.
  • There is a large user group and blogs devoted to all things Camel and the developers of Camel provide quick answers and have also been very quick to patch Camel, when bugs are reported.
  • Camel integrates well with well known frameworks like Spring, and other middleware products like Apache Karaf and Servicemix.
  • There are over 150 components for the Camel framework that help integrate with diverse software platforms.
  • Camel is also good for creating microservices.
Read full review
Cons
Adeptia
  • Support only in english and not always reactive.
Read full review
Apache
  • didn't work well when our developers tried to transform heavy data sets
  • Apache Camel's whole logic is based on java so team needs to have a great skill set in java
  • if there are a handful of workflows then Apache Camel's full potential can't be realized
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adeptia
We mainly choose Adeptia Connect for the friendly UI. From the first minutes, it was really easy to use and understand how it works and then manages complex connections.
Read full review
Apache
If you are looking for a Java-based open source low cost equivalent to webMethods or Azure Logic Apps, Apache Camel is an excellent choice as it is mature and widely deployed, and included in many vendored Java application servers too such as Redhat JBoss EAP. Apache Camel is lacking on the GUI tooling side compared to commercial products such as webMethods or Azure Logic Apps.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Adeptia
  • The user can set up the whole template and then enter the data or we simply have to connect that data by making use of connections from an account through an API.
  • We can do reference lookups in the database to further enhance it before sending it to the data link and as part of this process flow
  • We can attach by taking up a little bit of time or batch and this can be a multi-directional process. So I needed this data transformation
Read full review
Apache
  • Very fast time to market in that so many components are available to use immediately.
  • Error handling mechanisms and patterns of practice are robust and easy to use which in turn has made our application more robust from the start, so fewer bugs.
  • However, testing and debugging routes is more challenging than working is standard Java so that takes more time (less time than writing the components from scratch).
  • Most people don't know Camel coming in and many junior developers find it overwhelming and are not enthusiastic to learn it. So finding people that want to develop/maintain it is a challenge.
Read full review
ScreenShots