Apache Tomcat vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Tomcat
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Tomcat is an open-source web server supported by Apache.N/A
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
$0.08
per hour
Pricing
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Apache Tomcat
8.3
23 Ratings
3% above category average
Red Hat OpenShift
-
Ratings
IDE support7.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management7.923 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.023 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.323 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation9.823 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance8.723 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Apache Tomcat
-
Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift
7.7
77 Ratings
5% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.562 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.677 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings6.769 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.260 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.671 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.663 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings8.069 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings7.865 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.167 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings7.967 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.370 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(23 ratings)
8.6
(81 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(9 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(3 ratings)
8.5
(6 ratings)
Availability
6.0
(1 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
8.6
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache TomcatRed Hat OpenShift
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Excellent value for companies wishing to host Java applications in the cloud. Utilizing hosting tools such as load balancers and network and application firewalls, Tomcat can be part of a powerful system to host web applications to thousands of users. There has been consistency in the development and support of Tomcat since its initial release in the late '90s and the best commonalities have been carried forward. If you host Java web applications, Tomcat is as good as any for an application server.
Read full review
Red Hat
Support for non standard integrations having significant market opportunities.training and documentation and consistent support for desktop and other environments.the stability of the application is reliable for front end and backend without any lags or issues.runming various applications on Prem and in the cloud.all the data is being maintained in the cloud enables us to store large amount of data too.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Fast to start up, which is useful when we need to just check that our changes are working correctly.
  • Free, which allows us to not be involved with the finance/legal team about using it.
  • Bundled with Spring Boot, which makes it even more convenient for our testing.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Build processes are quicker, so our app devs can expedite application deployment.
  • Openshift serves as a great environment for collaboration and testing applications, prior to Production deployment.
  • Upgrades on OCPv4.X are easy, quick, and seamless.
  • Redhat constantly adds new feature sets on a regular basis.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Using tomcat manager to troubleshoot is not very informative. Error messages are vague, you have to dig into log files for more information about the problems.
  • Is great for simple web applications, but may not work for heavy development which may require a full J2EE stack, might like JBoss better.
  • Security in tomcat is not straightforward, as I discovered that you have to understand how to set up realms in tomcat in order to hash passwords, which I was not overly familiar with, which is a big deal when setting up users in the tomcat-users.xml file.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Would love to see easier use of OpenShift developer tools.
  • I would like to see better error logs with respect to issues that directly impact the User log. For example, we lost DNS and we were unable to log into the UI. It took some digging to relate the error to the loss of DNS.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
We have a huge knowledge of the product within our company and we're satisfied with the performance.
Read full review
Red Hat
Leverage OpenShift Online constantly at both the free and paid tiers. While AWS is convenient, it often brings more administration than I want to deal with for a quick application (i.e. Drupal or Wordpress blog). OpenShift also simplifies the DNS registration and ability to share application environments with team members
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Tomcat has a very rich API set which allows us to implement our automation script to trigger the deployment, configure, stop and start Tomcat from the command line. In our projects, we embedded Tomcat in our Eclipse in all of the developer's machines so they could quickly verify their code with little effort, Azure Webapp has strong support for Tomcat so we could move our application to Azure cloud very easy. One drawback is Tomcat UI quite poorly features but we almost do not use it.
Read full review
Red Hat
As I said before, the obserability is one of the weakest point of OpenShift and that has a lot to do with usability. The Kibana console is not fully integrated with OpenShift console and you have to switch from tab to tab to use it. Same with Prometheus, Jaeger and Grafan, it's a "simple" integration but if you want to do complex queries or dashboards you have to go to the specific console
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Apache
Tomcat doesn't have a built-in watchdog that ensures restart upon failure, so you have to provide it externally. A very good solution is java service wrapper. The community edition is able to restart Tomcat upon out of memories exceptions.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Performance
Apache
Tomcat support to customize memory used and allow us to define the Connection pool and thread pool to increase system performance and availability, Tomcat server itself consume very little memory and almost no footprint. We use Tomcat in our production environment which has up to thousands of concurrent users and it is stable and provides a quick response.
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Apache
Well, in actuality, I have never needed support for Apache Tomcat since it is configured and ready-to-go with no configuration needed on my end.
Read full review
Red Hat
Their customer support team is good and quick to respond. On a couple of occassions, they have helped us in solving some issues which we were finding a tad difficult to comprehend. On a rare occasion, the response was a bit slow but maybe it was because of the festival season. Overall a good experience on this front.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Eclipse Jetty is the best alternative for Apache Tomcat because which is also an open-source and lightweight servlet container like Tomcat. A major advantage of this over Tomcat is that Jetty server can easily be embedded with the source code of web applications. Since it requires less memory to operate, you may realize that it is very efficient.
Read full review
Red Hat
Openshift provides a way to deploy Containerized Java applications running on JBoss EAP and RHEL in a very easy way. Reducing server preparation time, hardening-server headaches, and deploying to different stages nightmares.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Apache
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
It's easy to understand what are being billed and what's included in each type of subscription. Same with the support (Std or Premium) you know exactly what to expect when you need to use it. The "core" unit approach on the subscription made really simple to scale and carry the workloads from one site to another.
Read full review
Scalability
Apache
It's very easy to add instances to an existing deployment and, using apache with mod proxy balancer, to scale up the serving farm
Read full review
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Tomcat is cheap and very quick to deploy, so it has benefited much when situation needs applications to be deployed quickly without wasting time on licensing and installations.
  • Plenty of documentation available so no vendor training is required. Support contract is not needed as well.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • OCP has allowed our platform to move towards a highly available infrastructure, and push our developers to provide more cloud-native applications and services
  • The initial deployment of OCP was a large costly investment, both in terms of monetary and man-hour resources. Once deployed however, the overhead has been more than manageable.
Read full review
ScreenShots