TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Atlassian Confluence vs. IBM Aspera on Cloud vs. Microsoft Teams

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Confluence

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AConfluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.

    $6.40

    per month per user

    IBM Aspera on Cloud

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AIBM Aspera on Cloud is an on-demand SaaS offering for global content transfer and exchange. It enables organizations to move large files and data sets securely and reliably across on-premises and multi-cloud environments at high speed. With Aspera on Cloud, organizations can store and access files and folders across multiple cloud-based and on-premises storage systems. Sharing among users is as simple as browsing or drag-and-drop — no matter where the files are stored — making…

    $1.01

    per month per GB transferred

    Microsoft Teams

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Pricing
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    Free for 10 Users
    Standard
    $6.40
    per month per user
    Premium
    $12.30
    per month per user
    Data Center
    220,000.00
    40,001+ Users - Annually
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Pay as You Go
    USD 1.01
    per month per GB transferred
    Essentials Edition
    Starting at $250.20
    per year
    Standard Plus Edition
    Starting at $7488
    per year
    Premium Edition
    Contact Sales
    per year
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.—Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Considered Multiple Products
    Atlassian
    Chose Confluence
    I think both are good
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    We use Jira for the IT tickets, so the step to use Atlassian Confluence was the logical decisson.
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    I personally prefer the usage of alternative project management or document storage apps. Atlassian Confluence is useful in having a centralised spot for multiple types of information, as opposed to Trello for example, and is much more structured. However, it has low visual …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    It integrates well with other SAAS products and has been our industry standard for all projects that we're involved in.
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    The way the knowledge is stored and indexed in Atlassian Confluence is very advanced so that it can be easily accessed. It supports including images, links, etc so that we can convey the idea very well. Overall it's very useful for organizations where new features are rolled …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    Atlassian Confluence is more intuitive than MS SharePoint, however, SharePoint has some reach features because of the MS integration with its tools stack.
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    Confluence smashes competitors out of the ballpark. There is no compromise for quality and great product design with Atlassian
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    Google Drive is not comparable to confluence, but it was the only other means for collaboration of documents and a shared hub for resources. But it serves more as a folder for resources rather than a repository of pages in information with links, documents, collaboration, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    There are complementary and we are in fact using both of them in out organisation. We are using Google Drive for advanced real-time cooperation when creating documents, since Google Drive can handle this in a more streamlined and easier way than Confluence. Still, Confluence …
    Incentivized
    Chose Confluence
    I have used other tools that allow for documentation and housing of other business-related documents but none that I used had the same integration or general ability to add and edit information. I am also a general user so I don't know how easy/difficult the backend is, but …
    Incentivized
    IBM
    Chose IBM Aspera on Cloud
    Teams can be really slow and the downloads sometimes come out corrupted or the program will just quit or it doesn't seem to like all files to download. While IBM Aspera is more universal and versatile with the files it downloads. Teams might look flashy but its not the best …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is a complementary tool I used in my software panel. So it can cover many cases where partners are not using the same tools as the ones used in my firm. It is a complementary tool with other ones like Miro, Slack, and Jira, for example, in order to facilitate …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    With Microsoft Teams you can better check each one's agenda. The background when in a meeting is better. Microsoft Teams also have more options for integrations in place.
    It's also easier and more intuitive.
    It also offers more options of communicating and not only video …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is just a nicer front end to SharePoint for file and document management but it also has a good communication network for internal and external parties. It's easy to use on mobile device as well. It also integrates well with Microsoft Power Platform etc, meaning …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    I think Teams is ahead of the game. Its tight integration with the Microsoft suite has no rival. Having Azure as the backend provides a secure environment in the cloud with content accessible anytime anywhere. Microsoft is heavily investing in the product and constantly adding …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    We used Adium in the past for our direct department and HipChat company-wide. I didn't mind HipChat so much, but it didn't have nearly as many features as Teams offers. Adium was a big pain in my butt because it is used for not just the company, but everything else you are …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    97 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    90%
    Would buy again
    255 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    87 Answers
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    21 Answers
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    225 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    100 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    26 Answers
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    255 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    45 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    13 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    144 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    54 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    19 Answers
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    174 Answers
    Features
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Atlassian Confluence and IBM Aspera on Cloud and Microsoft Teams
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    7.1
    158 Ratings
    8% below category average
    IBM Aspera on Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    241 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Task Management7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings8.1179 Ratings
    Gantt Charts7.912 Ratings00 Ratings8.196 Ratings
    Scheduling7.221 Ratings00 Ratings8.3208 Ratings
    Workflow Automation6.591 Ratings00 Ratings8.4126 Ratings
    Mobile Access7.0118 Ratings00 Ratings8.2229 Ratings
    Search7.0157 Ratings00 Ratings7.6212 Ratings
    Visual planning tools7.2127 Ratings00 Ratings8.4143 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Atlassian Confluence and IBM Aspera on Cloud and Microsoft Teams
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    7.9
    158 Ratings
    1% below category average
    IBM Aspera on Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    8.0
    251 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Chat6.415 Ratings00 Ratings9.0250 Ratings
    Notifications8.2156 Ratings00 Ratings8.5249 Ratings
    Discussions7.9149 Ratings00 Ratings8.7235 Ratings
    Surveys7.015 Ratings00 Ratings8.2146 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase9.0150 Ratings00 Ratings8.6157 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.03 Ratings00 Ratings6.547 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.37 Ratings00 Ratings5.743 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.610 Ratings00 Ratings9.1155 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Atlassian Confluence and IBM Aspera on Cloud and Microsoft Teams
    Feature
    Atlassian Confluence
    7.7
    157 Ratings
    4% below category average
    IBM Aspera on Cloud
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    236 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Versioning8.3137 Ratings00 Ratings8.6168 Ratings
    Video files6.9105 Ratings00 Ratings8.4202 Ratings
    Audio files6.997 Ratings00 Ratings8.8200 Ratings
    Document collaboration8.4153 Ratings00 Ratings8.9216 Ratings
    Access control8.7148 Ratings00 Ratings8.6198 Ratings
    Advanced security features8.4115 Ratings00 Ratings8.5158 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.947 Ratings00 Ratings5.353 Ratings
    Device sync8.486 Ratings00 Ratings8.6172 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    FileZilla
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    FileZilla
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (174 ratings)
    9.3
    (34 ratings)
    8.6
    (329 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (22 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (63 ratings)
    7.9
    (21 ratings)
    8.7
    (114 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.4
    (25 ratings)
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.0
    (114 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.8
    (4 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ConfluenceIBM Aspera on CloudMicrosoft Teams
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Atlassian
    It is well suited due to the below reasons 1. Easy collaboration between teams 2. Strong integration with other applications 3. Centralized documentation among teams and within the organisation 4. Project planning and report sharing 5. Employee onboarding is easier and maintain HR policies very well. Less appropriate in below scenarios When this is being used as a main tool for communication rather than its purpose of collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Aspera on Cloud is a great tool for the ones who are looking for a tool which can transfer large datasets, backups, raw files etc., quickly. I think that it is well suited where data transfer at high speed is required and reliability is important. However, it can be less useful for smaller files or data transfer as it can be done with basic tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Atlassian
    • Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
    • Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
    • Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Unlike many others , IBM Aspera on Cloud has the ability to transfer large files even upto 100s of GB really quick . The transfers that used to take 5-6 hours or even sometimes failed after waiting that much of time with IMB same files only take like 30 minutes even over long distances .
    • Not only it transfers data fast , but IBM Aspera on Cloud on cloud also handles inturrpted transfers well even in case of disconnection or bad connection , the platform automatically resumes from where it got paused saving us a lot of time in starting over . This is huge advantage for large files for example when shifting database exports or large technical confirguration bundles from a remote office with bad connection , IBM Aspera on Cloud resumes automatically and dont have to start it over .
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • All in one communication for Teams.
    • High quality and reliable both audio and video meetings.
    • Well organized and clear instant chat.
    • Excellent security features.
    • Beautiful integration with 3rd party tools and systems.
    • Perfect compatibility with windows ,android and iOS.
    • Allow meetings recordings for later us or sharing with teams that missed the live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Atlassian
    • UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
    • Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
    • Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Track upload/download usage OVERALL to know how much space is left
    • Track cloud storage overall to know how much space is left
    • More easily send single links to users for download, rather than full access (I know it is possible, but it is not intuitive)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
    • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
    • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Atlassian
    I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
    Read full review
    IBM
    1) It works. 2) Is is secure 3) It is fast It provides firms the ability to communicate with vendors other clients and new clients in a way that will help you grow your business. In our business, flies are getting larger larger and can hold companies back in their overall business goals.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Atlassian
    Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for project management, especially for internal documentation. It has a minimum governance requirement to use its full power. Also, it is a little pricy to unlock its full power as well, so it is not recommended for companies with a low budget in my opinion.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The interface is very pleasing and so easy to use. I have never used a program that was so simple and so effective. Other programs have too many unnecessary features and make everything really daunting and then you just go elsewhere. IBM Aspera is perfect for easy transfers with minimal features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Atlassian
    I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    We never had an issue with the product. The product works and is always available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Rare, but outages do happen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Atlassian
    We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    Performance is great!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Atlassian
    This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The support from IBM is fast and reliable. Very knowledgeable engineers provide you with the support on Aspera. We had a very good experience when opened tickets and we were able to get our issues resolved quickly. Most solutions are provided within a day so you can expect a quick turnaround time. Overall, the support has been very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Atlassian
    Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
    This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    The service provided by the authorized vendor was excellent. It was a good collaboration between the vendor IT team and internal IT team. They provided us with a timeline and we verified and approved that timeline. Daily stand ups and weekly meetups were conducted to update the internal team on progress. They were able to deliver all deliverables on time also, they conducted both alpha testing and beta version testing in time. Overall, they were able to complete the implementation in the given timeline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Atlassian
    We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    These cloud storage products deliver sufficient space to store data and access and have an array of ways to transfer this data and keep it secure. IBM Aspera on Cloud focuses on the transfer and makes it a lot faster mainly due to its patented tech and altered UDP protocol. Since most of production code uses IBM services, it was natural to go with IBM Aspera on Cloud.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Atlassian
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    Very good pricing. A lot of value with this product. Great ROI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Atlassian
    This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    It is an outstanding product. It is proven and works well. IBM has thought of everything as the product works well and it can scale. I highly recomend this product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Atlassian
    No answers on this topic
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Atlassian
    • We totally rely on this tool since a decade now and despite being so much transition in our company it has served us well in those transitions
    • Many times, during security audits we are asked to showcase our readiness for various compliance points and confluence helps us a lot in maintaining that
    • Talking about Confluence in front of clients and customers gives us an upper hand that we are up to date with latest trend and technologies and tools for our RnD planning and management
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • IBM Aspera has allowed us to scale our file-based deliveries to several terabytes across thousands of assets per month.
    • IBM Aspera has allowed us to deliver reliably without many issues, increasing operational efficiency.
    • IBM Aspera has allowed us to deliver materials on time, which has had a direct and positive impact on our content consumption.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
    • I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
    • If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Aspera on Cloud Screenshots

    Screenshot of automated workflowsScreenshot of simple transferScreenshot of transfer management