Attivo BOTsink

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Attivo BOTsink
ScoreĀ 8.2Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
As a network-based threat detection solution, Attivo BOTsink stands guard inside the business network, using high-interaction deception and decoy technology to lure attackers into engaging and revealing themselves. Through misdirection of the attack, the vendor states organizations gain the advantage of time to detect, analyze, and stop an attacker.N/A
Pricing
Attivo BOTsink
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Attivo BOTsink
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Attivo BOTsink
Considered Both Products
Attivo BOTsink
Chose Attivo BOTsink
Attivo BoTsink was selected based on cost price and wide coverage of detection capabilities. Our decision was primarily based on reducing efforts to identify and mitigation of attacks. The ease of deployment was additional factor in decision making. As compared to Zscaler ā€¦
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Attivo BOTsink
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
ScoreĀ 8.6Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
InsightIDR
InsightIDR
ScoreĀ 8.6Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Attivo BOTsink
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Attivo BOTsink
Likelihood to Recommend
Attivo Networks
It is best suited when deployed at perimeter and integrated with SIEM and SOAR solution. It will be able to replicate assets and display realistic configurations making difficult for hackers. We were able to avoid or block 40% of attacks targetted to our critical servers and could easily identify threat actors.
Read full review
Pros
Attivo Networks
  • Identifies devices
  • Provides threat details in real time
  • Provides network topology with potential threat paths
Read full review
Cons
Attivo Networks
  • More fine tuning of threat detection capabilities needed
  • Users should be able to modify AIML configuration
  • Improving the display dashboard
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Attivo Networks
Attivo BoTsink was selected based on cost price and wide coverage of detection capabilities. Our decision was primarily based on reducing efforts to identify and mitigation of attacks. The ease of deployment was additional factor in decision making. As compared to Zscaler Deception and SentinelOne Singularity I found Attivo BoTsink detects more threats
Read full review
Return on Investment
Attivo Networks
  • Advanced reporting has saved from hiring additional personnel to monitor security threats
  • Real time identification of threats saves response time from actual breach
  • Third-party needed to be leveraged to help configure Attivo BOTsink
Read full review
ScreenShots