AWS Amplify vs. Zadara Cloud Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS Amplify
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$0
Zadara Cloud Platform
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The Zadara Cloud Platform, from Zadara in Irvine, provides enterprise storage as a service (STaaS), providing block storage, object storage, or file (NAS) storage in the cloud. Zadara's features include snapshots, replication, multi-zone high availability, online volume migration, thin provisioning, and all in a cloud-based package.N/A
Pricing
AWS AmplifyZadara Cloud Platform
Editions & Modules
Basic
$0
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS AmplifyZadara Cloud Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS AmplifyZadara Cloud Platform
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
AWS AmplifyZadara Cloud Platform
Small Businesses
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS AmplifyZadara Cloud Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS AmplifyZadara Cloud Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
You should go for using it in particular if you are going to be build code once run everywhere kind of things and you want to not write most of the backend on your own. As AWS Amplify can take care of a lot of backend things for you and you can manage most of the stuff from front end coding. perfect for using in react/ flutter apps. Additionally better to use when you are going to use other AWS service and don't want to scatter things around
Read full review
Zadara
I only used it as a proof of concept for some products. For me, it seemed to be focused on the European market, but it´s a pretty new cloud provider in comparison to other major competitors like Amazon and Azure which are much more developed, so they are still missing some functionality and features.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • UI and design of the AWS Amplify for easier setup
  • painless user flow for react, angular etc
  • easier setup using CLI with effective questions.
Read full review
Zadara
  • Host VMs using windows and linux
  • Provide object storage
  • Provide block storage
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • AWS Amplify init ends up changing the cloud. there should be deploy kind of thing
  • confusions between Front end backend as both codes get mixed. this should be kept separate
  • better documentation with use cases
Read full review
Zadara
  • VMs misses some functionality like being able to swap the boot disk.
  • To allocate storage to the VM, you need to configure iscsi connections from both ends.
  • Marketplace still missing major products.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Its AWS take on the Firebase kind of system for providing backend as a service. Although Firebase has advantage of bigger community, better documentation and code examples; AWS Amplify is creating its own space where you will be going to use AWS products and Infrastructure in your project. Amplify Dynamo DB and GraphQL have clear cut advantages that have no direct alternative in Firebase as real time db and firestore documents both lack versioning.
Read full review
Zadara
Zadara is a new cloud provider, so it does not have all functionalities and features as its major competitors like Amazon Cloud and MS Azure. It is up to you to test it, but personally, I still prefer MS Azure as a cloud provider.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • saves time on righting backend interfaces
  • easier to setup with react/ react native
  • lambda functions can be used to extend functionality
Read full review
Zadara
  • No real impact, as I only used it for some proof of concept.
  • New cloud provider still missing some features and functionality.
  • An alternative cloud provider hopefully cheaper than its competitors.
Read full review
ScreenShots