What users are saying about
1 Rating
3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

AWS CodeArtifact

It is well suited for custom developed artifacts that we build in house. Once stored in the repo they are easily shareable and can be used in a ci/cd pipeline to automate deployment.
Lisa Bogart | TrustRadius Reviewer

ProGet

As of current, the only artifactory management tool that I would recommend is ProGet. The free version is plentiful in features, supporting all feed types that the paid plans do. The paid plans also add even more capabilities on top of the free plan, such as data retention policies, which helps to minimize storage waste on my server and keep everything clean.
Hunter Wittenborn | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

AWS CodeArtifact

  • Stores versions of resources
  • Provides ready access to the historical versions
Lisa Bogart | TrustRadius Reviewer

ProGet

  • The Docker registry feature works great. Compared to Sonatype Nexus 3, I don't need to set up extra ports, as everything just works off the port ProGet itself is running on.
  • Debian feeds support automatic GPG key generation, without me having to create or manage them myself. This is another spot where ProGet is better than Nexus, as you have to manually create and specify a key with Nexus, while ProGet simply handles it all for you.
Hunter Wittenborn | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

AWS CodeArtifact

  • I have had minimal involvement with automating our deployments but feedback from other team members leads me to believe it will take some more learning to accomplish
  • Make sharing the repo easier
Lisa Bogart | TrustRadius Reviewer

ProGet

  • When running ProGet inside of a Docker container, changes to some settings requires a manual restart of the container (i.e. with 'docker restart x').
Hunter Wittenborn | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

AWS CodeArtifact

We chose CodeArtifact without a lot of research because it fit easily into the AWS development toolset easily.
Lisa Bogart | TrustRadius Reviewer

ProGet

Both Sonatype Nexus 3 and ProGet support all the feed types I use, but ProGet simply does them better.The Docker feeds run on the same port as ProGet itself, while Nexus requires additional ports to be set up, which can be a burden when running in Docker.Debian feeds also support GPG key creation without having to manually specify one, again, reducing the burden for me to manually do things, allowing me to set up and distribute my programs even quicker.
Hunter Wittenborn | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

AWS CodeArtifact

  • It helped us get our first service up and running in the cloud and allowed us to shut down a more expensive solution
Lisa Bogart | TrustRadius Reviewer

ProGet

  • I don't need to develop custom solutions for distributing my software, as ProGet does it all for me.
  • ProGet also integrates easily into my CI systems, with a fully-featured API that allows me to upload packages right after building.
Hunter Wittenborn | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

AWS CodeArtifact

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

ProGet

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison