Barracuda Secure SD-WAN vs. Group Dynamic

Whether it's SaasS or internet-bound traffic, Barracuda is capable of directly sending internet with appropriate security inspection with no backhauls. In my department, we achieve consistent network link pooling, data caching optimization for bots handling critical workloads. There is always enogh bandwidth for applications with Barracuda optimization. We are however not completely satisfied with their link redundancy handling capabilities as I've explained.

Incentivized

It really comes down to the fact that it is easy to use for our employees and that makes my job easier.

Incentivized

• Uses next-gen firewalls to assure data security
• Scales dynamically despite the traffic to match workloads

Incentivized

• Their mobile app makes it easy for FSA reimbursements to the end user. Snap a shot of the EOB with your phone and upload it for payment.
• They have push reporting that makes the accounting process simple to reconcile.
• HRA claims only require a receipt and one form submited via fax or email to get paid.

Incentivized

• It Still cannot combat link redundancy speedily. One time a network link failed and it took quite a while before restoring traffic from the backup link.

Incentivized

• I would like to see a mobile app for the HRA process.
• Adding in a field for the date and reason of job separation with a confirmation of some sort instead of an email/messaging type method would be more user friendly.

Incentivized

• Has sufficient firewalls, we don't need to engage other providers.
• I believe it has provided plenty of savings in license costs for the company by performing multiple WAN tasks

Incentivized

• Group Dynamic has taken the burden of record keeping and compliance out of our hands and has cut our risk of audit penalties to zero.

Incentivized