Cisco TrustSec vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco TrustSec
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is an intrusion prevention system (IPS) used to stop zero-day attacks inline in real-time. In addition to the prevention of known threats, the solution helps to stop never-before-seen exploit attempts and command and control with its inline deep learning engines that aims to provide prevention of zero-day injection attacks and evasive command and control.N/A
Pricing
Cisco TrustSecPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco TrustSecPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco TrustSecPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Best Alternatives
Cisco TrustSecPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 7.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco TrustSecPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
6.8
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco TrustSecPalo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
  • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
  • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
  • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
  • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto NTP is an appropriate suite of protection for any enterprise environment or anyone that truly needs some serious perimeter protection in a one-stop, all-in-one unit. There are no modules or add-ons or clunky interfaces to deal with it; everything works out of one management plane, licensing, implementation, monitoring. updating, etc. As a network admin, that is immensely valuable to me. Additionally, I get real-time reporting on all the stuff NTP is catching, and it is nothing to shirk at. The real value in NTP comes in only after you begin doing SSL-decryption, however, to truly inspect the traffic. Short of that, you are just seeing a bunch of encrypted data and the NTP suite of tools isn't going to avail you. NTP plus decryption, though, is invaluable!
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
  • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Preventing the data breaches
  • Safeguarding Hybrid and cloud environments
  • Reducing the false alarms
  • Network Perimeter secuirty
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Help and solutions if needed, support
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • It can ingest feeds from other tools and security solutions
  • Threat protection should share it intel data with other vendors
  • Users should be able to allow/bypass or create [their] own signatures from intel shared from SOC team
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
The reason to give ATP this rating is it specialises in detecting command control traffic whose primary role is to identify unusual outbound traffic patterns which blocks the command control communication and notifies to different security team to take necessary actions. ATP Global protect holds the responsibility of inspecting all the inbound and outbound traffic going to and from corporate system regardless of the network they are on. ATP plays a major role to identify the threats that blocks threats that could lead to data breach also it identifies any malicious file enter the system will be blocked proactively
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
Having used Palo Alto Firewalls for years, implementing threat protection was the next step in perimeter security. Works much better than the few competitors I have personally used. Frequent content updates occur which may impact some policy rules, but that is normal across most vendors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Reduction in IT operational costs
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • New deployment hasn't been fully calculated yet.
  • With the addition of Panorama and central logging, event investigation has become more streamlined.
Read full review
ScreenShots