Likelihood to Recommend The focus of the equipment is SoHo, that is, small businesses or companies and even domestic use. It meets these scenarios very well. Using for large scale, they can present difficulties to maintain throughput, that is, its use in large networks can be difficult to maintain. Another issue to be taken into account is technical assistance, they are not as agile as the competition.
Read full review If you have a big environment with a lot of edge switch needs and department groups, then Extreme's fabric connect can save a lot of management time. If your environment is small then you may want to stick with the traditional model since fabric connect costs more. Also if you make lots of configuration changes all the time then fabric connect will be helpful. Otherwise, making an occasional change you don't need fabric connect.
Read full review Pros Easy to use GUI Inexpensive Available in a different number of ports. Support for copper as well as fiber ports. Available in gigabit ethernet and above speeds as well. Read full review Cloud management SFP+ uplinks Stacking capability Robust CLI Read full review Cons Updates frequently End of life cycle and end of support cycle. As D-Link frequently changes its products and customer have to switch very often. Read full review Improved Extreme Management Console UI. More robust CLI auditing/logging. Easier log harvesting for adverse events. Read full review Usability D-Link Ethernet Switches are working fine and fulfill all of our organization's needs cost-wise and efficiency-wise. The rating that I gave would vary based on performance and durability. We used an open environment without an IP-rated network rack, but its working fine and we handle all weather issues carefully and manage the network smoothly. Takeaways: cost effective, handles complex networks, and very good performance.
Read full review Support Rating I have given it 9 out of 10 just because of its low cost and additional features that have been an integral part of any product, otherwise, the load management part was far more inferior as compared to the Cisco switches, as those switches have a spanning tree protocol built-in.
Read full review There hasn't been a single problem with the code or hardware that hasn't been resolved in a timely fashion. You get technicians who know the product and who will work with you to get things fixed. That being said, I never ran into a problem with Cisco tech support either. I love that both groups were willing to teach me as they fixed things.
Read full review Alternatives Considered They stack up great. In performance, Price, Physical style. I have been around many networks with a business that has spent three times as much on a network solution and Dlink matches up toe to toe. Has of now they are moving over to Cisco language. So this will improve the availability of engineers and support.
Read full review Foundry, HP, Cisco, Brocade. Extreme performance is equivalent or better without the price tag added just for their name
Read full review Return on Investment Reduction of oscillations in the network caused by repeater equipment (which was replaced by D-links). Low cost of implementation and acquisition, making it possible to acquire a sufficient quantity to meet the entire park and demand. Due to its low price, we have no losses with maintenance, and can simply purchase other equipment for replacement. Read full review Extreme [Ethernet Switches] have a long-life. You can easily get 7 years in main production life depending on when you buy in the product life-cycle. Extreme [Ethernet Switches] are expensive, no doubt, but we also don't have "weird" network problems or other issues with the network randomly going down. If you use fabric connect switches then the ease of managing many switches is of no concern. Read full review ScreenShots