Dell PowerEdge FX vs. FlexPod

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dell PowerEdge FX
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Dell's PowerEdge FX architecture is a solution for a software-defined converged infrastructure.N/A
FlexPod
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
FlexPod is a converged infrastructure option developed by NetApp and Cisco. FlexPod is available in streamlined and simplified Express version, and the FlexPod Datacenter edition for enterprise private clouds, VDI, scale-out infrastructure, or software defined data centers.N/A
Pricing
Dell PowerEdge FXFlexPod
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dell PowerEdge FXFlexPod
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dell PowerEdge FXFlexPod
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
Dell PowerEdge FXFlexPod
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Dell PowerEdge FXFlexPod
Likelihood to Recommend
Dell Technologies
No answers on this topic
Cisco + NetApp
FlexPod is great for mid to large size companies, where the flexibility and depth of a traditional SAN and high performance servers is required. For smaller companies, it might make more sense to go with a hyper converged solution such as Hyperflex or Nutanix (both of which can still run on Cisco UCS servers, but would not be making use of Netapp storage), to meet the requirements in a smaller footprint.
Read full review
Pros
Dell Technologies
No answers on this topic
Cisco + NetApp
  • Single Pane of Glass Server Administration.
  • Ease of firmware upgrades.
  • Incredible support when you have an issue. The Cisco/NetApp/VMware FlexPod support teams work together and drive your issues down to the root cause.
Read full review
Cons
Dell Technologies
No answers on this topic
Cisco + NetApp
  • KVM control of the blades still requires Java. Avocent is using HTML5 now, and it would be nice if the KVM console for these UCS blades could too.
  • Price - Like any Cisco product, there are cheaper options. They aren't nearly as fully featured, but at times, it would be nice if UCS could be a bit cheaper.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dell Technologies
No answers on this topic
Cisco + NetApp
Being a Cisco shop already it was a natural fit to go with a solution based on their technology. Then add in VMware which we are were already using - that was two out of the three for the FlexPod. Then factor in NetApp's de-duplication technology and flexibility in configuration and options and it's a match made in heaven. Not to say we haven't had some stumbles and some issues but it works and it works well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Dell Technologies
No answers on this topic
Cisco + NetApp
  • FlexPod has allowed our team to be extremely quick to resopnd to new VM build requests. The amount of RAM, CPU and backplane offered by B series blades allows us to go with very high VM density. The quick deployment of service profile templates also means that when we have to add new hosts, it is done quicker.
  • FlexPod and the service profile portability (along with VMware) has allowed for full upgrades and migrations from M1/M2 series hardware to M4 hardware without any downtime or outages to the clients. Blades can be moved into new chassis, or service profiles moved to new generation blades, with no impact to the customers' ability to work.
Read full review
ScreenShots